Sunday Times

Liquor ad ban could hurt new brands

Decline in overall sales would cut government revenue

- By ASHA SPECKMAN speckmana@sundaytime­s.co.za

● Megabrewer Anheuser-Busch InBev has the benefit of scale and a portfolio of some of the most recognised beer brands on its side, but it is anticipati­ng some impact when the government’s proposed ban on liquor advertisin­g takes flight.

AB InBev holds almost 30% of the global beer market and 62.7% of the South African market, with brands that include Stella Artois, Peroni, Corona and Castle Lager in its portfolio.

Newer brands, such as alcohol-free lager Castle Free and craft beer Flying Fish, are on the rise. But AB InBev Africa and SAB Zone president Ricardo Tadeu said on the sidelines of the 2017 results presentati­on on Thursday he expected tardy sales if a bill to ban liquor advertisem­ents were implemente­d. “[Sales] might be slower, it might be more difficult.”

The cabinet is considerin­g the Liquor Amendment Bill, which may ban liquor advertisem­ents on TV and radio between 6am and 10pm. The drinking age limit would be increased to 21 years from 18 years. The Department of Health wants a complete ban on advertisin­g.

Castle Free, a non-alcoholic lager, was unveiled as the headline sponsor for the Rugby Sevens “Blitzbokke” on Wednesday. Tadeu said: “This is a product that we have great expectatio­ns of. The acceptance from the public has exceeded our expectatio­ns. We are investing capacity this year. Every- thing we produce for Castle Free is sold in less than three weeks.”

AB InBev planned to sell packs of nine beers that consisted of Castle lagers and three Castle Frees to drive greater acceptance of the product.

“If there’s an advertisem­ent ban I believe that what’s going to happen is more investment into the trade where the consumers are. They have the awareness that the brand is there, it’s available. Building brands from scratch may become more difficult and this is one negative side,” he said.

AB Inbev’s beer revenues in South Africa grew 6% last year but beer volumes rose by only 0.9%. Its premium brands saw tripledigi­t growth. “The good thing about global brands is people already have them at the back of their minds,” Tadeu said.

Per capita consumptio­n levels at 60 litres in South Africa was relatively mature compared to other countries in the region. But there was room for improvemen­t in sales for inhome consumptio­n as opposed to consumptio­n in taverns, he said.

Sibani Mngadi, chairman of the South African Liquor Brand Owners Associatio­n, said competitio­n among brands would be skewed. “In places where advertisin­g is banned then your market freezes at that point in terms of brand equity. Whatever is the strongest brand remains the strongest.”

The act recognised the need for diversity and the need to create opportunit­y for small entrants. But Mngadi said there was growth in the small craft brewers category, particular­ly gin, which was the strongest-growing spirit category, mostly in the Western Cape. “All of them are coming up with brands that are largely unknown, which then will require marketing over time for them to challenge establishe­d brands.”

A study by Genesis Analytics indicated the ban could result in a 7% decline in sales by volume, which would ultimately affect government revenues. The impact could be felt in the first year of the ban and those brands targeting specific age groups would be affected adversely, Mngadi said.

Euromonito­r Internatio­nal research analyst Christele Chokossa said a ban may have “detrimenta­l short-term effects on AB InBev, considerin­g the fact that the company has lately been using aggressive marketing strategies to mitigate intensifie­d competitiv­e pressures from Heineken South Africa.” But in the long run the impact would shrink considerin­g the equity of the core brands.

The proposed liquor act will include beverages with 0.5% alcohol content by volume and higher. Anything with a smaller alcohol content would fall under the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfecta­nts Act, Chokossa said. “AB InBev could benefit from the expansion of its low-alcohol range. In 2017 already, the company introduced Castle Free, an alcoholic beer with only 0.05% ABV.”

Competitio­n will be skewed and growing craft brewers won’t be able to advertise and challenge establishe­d brands

The strongest brand remains the strongest

Sibani Mngadi South African Liquor Brand Owners Associatio­n

 ?? Picture: South Coast Herald ?? Charles Glass, master brewer of lager. Now AB InBev is betting on a new non-alcoholic variant, Castle Free, to make up for slacker sales expected if the government were to pass the Liquor Amendment Bill into law.
Picture: South Coast Herald Charles Glass, master brewer of lager. Now AB InBev is betting on a new non-alcoholic variant, Castle Free, to make up for slacker sales expected if the government were to pass the Liquor Amendment Bill into law.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa