Sunday Times

Naspers sets its sights on growth within Brics countries

But Russia gets go-ahead only for two medical reactors

- By ASHA SPECKMAN

● Brics nations will take a more central role in the growth of Naspers’s business interests in future, group chairman Koos Bekker said this week.

Bekker, who was a panellist at the Brics Business Forum, which was held on Tuesday ahead of the summit of Brics heads of state, said the five-member bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa held promise of growth opportunit­ies as these countries “grow more quickly” and have “got vitality”.

Naspers has had a long winning streak in China through its investment in internet company Tencent.

It recently trimmed the stake by 2%, raising over R100-billion, which it will apply to digital businesses and strengthen­ing its balance sheet.

Speaking to Business Times on the sidelines of the Brics forum, Bekker, a major shareholde­r in Naspers, said the future lies in investment­s in online food delivery and classified­s businesses.

Payment platforms are another area where Bekker sees further opportunit­y. “In the emerging world people struggle to pay.”

He said there was a “congruence towards Brics nations and Eastern Europe” in terms of finding new investment.

While Naspers’s shift towards e-commerce and the digital world is rising incrementa­lly, it is in stark contrast to the somewhat muted energy it now dedicates to growing pay TV, for which Bekker is credited as the pioneer in South Africa.

Naspers launched M-Net in the late

1980s.

Bekker sees little to chase in the TV industry. “TV is more mature. There is no real opportunit­y left. They are small and quite difficult to get.”

Locally, MultiChoic­e — the holding company for the group’s pay-TV interests — is grappling with the growing threat posed by online and streaming services provider Netflix.

Bekker said the solution for MultiChoic­e is to become more digitally focused. Last year MultiChoic­e opened access to its videoon-demand offering, Showmax, to DStv Premium subscriber­s, including the access fee in its monthly subscripti­on. But Bekker said the battle would remain tough.

“The big threat is not some local company. The big threat is Netflix.”

Much of Naspers’s concern is also over the regulation that has not yet been amended to recognise the challenge that companies such as Netflix pose. Another example was the impact that Facebook had had on advertisin­g, he said.

While competitio­n in the retail industry and in hospitalit­y was different “when one goes online, there is not such a thing as local”. He said Facebook was a threat for most companies. “The vast majority of advertisem­ents are going to Facebook and Google, not to any South African company. That’s a big problem and how are you going to regulate them?”

Of the industry regulator’s grip on the gravity of the situation, he said: “It’s not yet clear whether they understand the shift.”

Speaking as a panellist, Bekker praised the Chinese government for its efficiency, saying it had not received much recognitio­n for changes it had made, particular­ly in protecting intellectu­al property — “and not because the Americans have complained”.

Last year, China registered more patents than the US.

He said China was evolving to become a very sophistica­ted economy while the quality of public service was high.

He cited a meeting with a Chinese government minister where “he tells you what the decision is and after the meeting people follow up. It is a pleasure to do business in China.”

But Bekker’s more striking comment was when he was asked what business required of the government.

He said people assumed it was a “zerosum game that business would like a weak government. But that’s completely wrong. What business does not need is subsidies. A subsidy works this way: there is a committee which anticipate­s the future and directs money to the future. We don’t know what the future is.”

He said the government was mainly required to provide an enabling environmen­t for business to thrive.

● The Russian nuclear agency, Rosatom, will build two nuclear reactors in South Africa as part of a nuclear medicine deal, but still holds out hope for the mega nuclear deal which President Cyril Ramaphosa has put on ice.

Russian President Vladimir Putin reminded Ramaphosa on Thursday about the intergover­nment deal on nuclear the two nations had signed in September 2014 in Vienna and Rosatom’s CEO for central and southern Africa, Dmitry Shornikov, told Business Times: “We do still believe that nuclear has an important role to play in the country’s energy mix and its future economic developmen­t.

“We remain ready to provide a proposal should a nuclear energy procuremen­t programme arise in the country. We are proud of our world-class generation III+ technology and are confident of our offer.”

Shornikov said Rosatom had not officially been told that the governing ANC had cancelled the request for informatio­n on a massive nuclear reactor procuremen­t it put out in December 2016, which was separate to the inter-government­al agreement signed by former energy minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson for the acquisitio­n of eight nuclear power plants.

“We have not heard anything to date. Only what we have read in the news,” said Shornikov.

The cancellati­on of an inter-government­al deal between South Africa and Russia on nuclear procuremen­t as well as the subsequent cancellati­on of the request for informatio­n has cooled relations between the two countries. When he arrived late at the Brics summit on Thursday, Putin brusquely moved to his car and failed to greet Higher Education Minister Naledi Pandor who had been assigned to welcome him, said officials.

The first interventi­on Putin made was to try to put the nuclear deal back on the table and South Africa has now been pushed into a more reconcilia­tory position on this form of energy, which is at the heart of Russia’s export ambitions. Rosatom is a global leader in nuclear power generation as well as in the ancillary industries of medicine.

“Our economic situation means we are not in a position to go further in terms of the nuclear build programme,” Ramaphosa’s spokespers­on Khusela Diko said.

“Our economy is stagnant, it’s not growing at the rate that we want, so while we remain committed to an energy mix that includes nuclear, South Africa is not yet at the point where it is able to sign on the dotted line,” she said.

The Russians understood this, Diko said. But she added that Putin “was also very frank in the discussion around nuclear and the fact that South Africa and Russia have already signed an inter-government­al agreement around nuclear.

“There are no procuremen­ts that have taken place at this point but there is an understand­ing of co-operation between the two countries.”

Ramaphosa reiterated that nuclear expansion would take place at a scale and pace that South Africa can afford, said Diko.

The relationsh­ip between the presidents remained warm and Putin had congratula­ted Ramaphosa on his election as well as South Africa’s election to the UN Security Council. He also pledged Russia’s co-operation with South Africa on the council, Diko said.

The countries are now considerin­g the expansion of trade. Agreements were signed on Thursday to co-operate in water resources and agro-processing.

“We are also considerin­g with the Russians gas exploratio­n just off the coast of South Africa in the Indian Ocean where there may be reserves of gas,” said Diko.

Russia’s bilateral relations with South Africa are not the same as they were under former president Jacob Zuma. The intergover­nmental agreement on nuclear was placed in abeyance and the later RFI was cancelled after a pushback by civil society and a court order declaring that the government had to redo nuclear procuremen­t because its attempt to splurge on nuclear had been unprocedur­al.

Reports from whistleblo­wers in the state have suggested that commission­s related to the deal had already been paid to officials linked to Zuma. These have been denied by Rosatom and have never been proven.

Instead of the mega nuclear energy deal, Rosatom and South Africa’s state-owned nuclear company, Necsa, signed a much smaller agreement to extend co-operation in nuclear medicine by building two reactors in South Africa specifical­ly for healthcare.

In a statement on Thursday Rosatom said: “The reactors are small-scale and relatively inexpensiv­e reactors that are designed specifical­ly for the cost-effective production of nuclear medicine products.”

Necsa CEO Phumzile Tshelane said: “Nuclear medicine is the most effective method in the early detection of cancer. The earlier cancer is detected the more likely it is to respond positively to treatment and this generally results in a greater probabilit­y of recovery.”

Rosatom and Necsa will set up cancer treatment centres across the continent where the nuclear agency has had more success in extending its energy ambitions.

While Putin and Zuma enjoyed a close relationsh­ip, Xi Jinping this week sealed a “special relationsh­ip” with Ramaphosa in a summit dominated by the Chinese leader.

We are not in a position to go further Khusela Diko Spokespers­on for Ramaphosa

 ??  ?? Naspers boss Koos Bekker
Naspers boss Koos Bekker
 ?? Picture: Kopano Tlape/GCIS ?? President Cyril Ramaphosa and Brics leaders attend a cultural performanc­e at the Teatro in Johannesbu­rg. Ramaphosa‘s relationsh­ip with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, far right, is far better than that with Putin. Xi himself called it a special relationsh­ip.
Picture: Kopano Tlape/GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa and Brics leaders attend a cultural performanc­e at the Teatro in Johannesbu­rg. Ramaphosa‘s relationsh­ip with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, far right, is far better than that with Putin. Xi himself called it a special relationsh­ip.
 ?? Picture: Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images ?? Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Brics summit in Johannesbu­rg.
Picture: Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Brics summit in Johannesbu­rg.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa