Sunday Times

Challenge to Net1-UEPS to pay back the money

- ANN CROTTY

LAST year, Cash Paymaster Services (CPS) received a R317millio­n windfall from the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) that helped lift the profit performanc­e of its holding company, Net1-UEPS.

Now, the non-profit Corruption Watch has asked the high court to order that the money be repaid to Sassa. The civil society watchdog said that the extra payment was “not justified” under the multibilli­on-rand tender Cash Paymaster Services won in 2012 to distribute social grants to 16 million beneficiar­ies.

David Lewis, who leads Corruption Watch, said it was unclear why this payment was made.

On Thursday, Net1-UEPS issued a statement saying Sassa’s payment had been made to recover “additional implementa­tion costs” of reregister­ing grant beneficiar­ies in 2012.

“At the time, Sassa requested Net1 to biometrica­lly register all social grant beneficiar­ies . . . as a result, Net1 performed approximat­ely 11 million additional registrati­ons that did not form part of its monthly service fee and claimed a cost recovery from Sassa,” the statement read.

This was done to root out “ghost beneficiar­ies”, or people being paid grants they weren’t entitled to -— cutting fraud “by billions of rand”.

But Corruption Watch said Net1 still hadn’t explained how it could have been paid so much extra money without a new tender process being run.

Lewis said “the initial contract between Sassa and CPS, concluded in 2012 and since set aside by the Constituti­onal Court, provided for registrati­on of all beneficiar­ies but not for re-registrati­on”.

This would have required a new tender by Sassa, he said.

What makes this particular­ly troubling, Lewis said, is that the R317-million was paid after the Constituti­onal Court ruled that the original contract between Sassa and Net1-UEPS was irregular and unlawful.

The non-profit organisati­on said it had also found “serious irregulari­ties” in the reregistra­tion process.

The latest salvo by Corruption Watch adds to a growing list of challenges facing Net1-UEPS as it battles to hold on to what has been described by a judge as the most valuable contract ever awarded by the South African government.

The five-year contract to distribute R10-billion each month to beneficiar­ies of social grants, old-age pensions and other welfare payments is worth R2-billion a year to Net1-UEPS.

In a recent submission to the US’s Nasdaq exchange, where Net1-UEPS is listed, the company disclosed several “risk factors”. These included the 2013 Constituti­onal Court ruling that Sassa’s decision to award the tender to Net1 was invalid, so a new tender was required.

Net1 said: “We cannot predict whether our current Sassa contract will remain in effect for the remainder of its five-year term. We derive a substantia­l portion of our revenues from this contract and from the provision of financial and other services to our card-holder base. If we were to lose our Sassa contract or we were to obtain a new contract on terms that are substantia­lly inferior to our current contract, our business would suffer significan­tly.”

Last month, the Constituti­onal Court set deadlines for completion of the new tender process and said it would continue strict oversight of the process.

Barclays Africa Group’s AllPay, which competed with Cash Paymaster Service for the 2012 contract, has been the main challenger. Non-government­al group the Black Sash is also particular­ly aggrieved that CPS deducts money from beneficiar­ies for microloans and airtime — which it says is illegal.

Net1-UEPS described these deductions as relating to “innovative financial and other services” it provides, “including, at their election, certain social welfare recipient card holders”.

Net1-UEPS is also dealing with a challenge from the National Credit Regulator, which has applied to cancel the registrati­on of its subsidiary, Moneyline Financial Services, as a credit provider.

The regulator claimed that Moneyline, which provides microloans, contravene­d the National Credit Act by including child-support grants and fosterchil­d grants in affordabil­ity assessment­s it performs before granting credit. Net1-UEPS said the regulator’s allegation­s contained “factual inaccuraci­es”.

The various challenges have done nothing to dampened investor enthusiasm. The share price has risen to about R166 since slumping to R80 in December 2013.

The Black Sash is particular­ly aggrieved that CPS deducts money from beneficiar­ies

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa