Sunday Tribune

Enviroserv brings out more experts

Company toxicology report shows fumes won’t cause cancer

- NOKUTHULA NTULI

TOXICOLOGY experts hired by Enviroserv have said in a report that they could not rule out that exposure to the fumes hanging over the Upper Highway region posed no health risk. However they doubted the fumes caused cancer.

The Infotox team, led by chemical toxicology and human risk assessment specialist, Dr Willie van Niekerk, was appointed by Enviroserv in October to conduct a human health risk assessment. The report was handed to the company last month.

This was after an escalation in the number and intensity of community complaints about the smell with people saying “toxic fumes” from the landfill were making them sick.

“Cancer risks were calculated and it was concluded that cumulative cancer risks associated with all carcinogen­ic substances were not significan­t and did not reflect reasons for concern,” the report said.

But, in a submission to the Department of Environmen­tal Affairs, the civil group, Upper Highway Air (UHA) has questioned the credibilit­y of the Infotox report.

They allege it was a watered-down version of the initial report compiled by the same firm in March.

One inconsiste­ncy the group highlighte­d was the claim that the risk of adverse health effects associated with exposure to hydrogen sulphide (H2S) in communitie­s living around the landfill was not high because the concentrat­ion was low.

UHA said this contradict­ed the initial report.

There Van Niekerk said reactions to hydrogen sulfide could result in respirator­y effects, nasal symptoms, sore throats, cough and dyspnoea.

By way of example the report said that upper respirator­y tract bleeding was the predominan­t complaint in a study of workers temporaril­y living in an oil field camp that intermitte­ntly experience­d short term or low concentrat­ion exposure.

More symptoms were also similar to those reported by residents in the Upper Highway area which included headaches, wheezing, shortness of breath and nasal congestion.

Enviroserv’s occupation­al health practition­er Dr Carlos de Nobrega’s claim that none of the landfill’s employees suffered any health symptoms related to fumes has also come under attack with the UHA saying there was no reliable evidence to prove this.

UHA’S own air quality specialist, Dr Lisa Ramsay from WSP Parsons Brinckerho­ff, also highlighte­d discrepanc­ies between the WSP results and those of the 15 hydrocarbo­n samples collected by Infotox.

“The maximum benzene concentrat­ion measured on site (890 μg/m3) by Infotox was at the brine tank. This concentrat­ion falls below our fenceline measuremen­t of 3 667 μg/ m3,” she said in one of the examples.

Ramsay said further on site measuremen­ts were required since the current data collected by Infotox might be an underestim­ate of the real impact of the landfill.

“We are confident that the source of the volatile organic compounds we measured was the Enviroserv landfill site. The intensity of the hydrocarbo­n odour increased as we moved closer to the Enviroserv fenceline. One does not expect off-site measuremen­ts to be higher than measuremen­ts at the source, as is the case here,” she explained.

The UHA has accused Enviroserv of misreprese­nting the implicatio­ns of dumping 16 000 tons of gypsum and 46 000 tons of aluminium then deliberate­ly omitting some of the informatio­n such as the hydrogen sulfide reading for at least five months last year.

Enviroserv’s chief executive Dean Thompson said he would not be able to comment on the Infotox report as the matter was before the Durban High Court as part of the UHA’S bid to get the landfill permanentl­y shut down.

Of the remedial action on site he said they were working according to the odour and gas management plan submitted to the DEA.

“The engineerin­g design for the progressiv­e capping design of the front face of the landfill has been approved and constructi­on has started. We are awaiting the design approval from the gas extraction and treatment system and as soon as this approval has been received, this installati­on will commence. The estimated completion date is still August,” he said.

 ??  ?? More than R1.5bn will be pumped into the developmen­t of a new mall in Kwadukuza that is hoped to create at least 2 400 jobs during its constructi­on.
More than R1.5bn will be pumped into the developmen­t of a new mall in Kwadukuza that is hoped to create at least 2 400 jobs during its constructi­on.
 ??  ?? The Upper Highway Air civic says inconsiste­ncies in measured hydrogen sulfide levels and a health impact assessment undermined the credibilit­y of Infotox’s report on Enviroserv’s landfill in Shongweni.
The Upper Highway Air civic says inconsiste­ncies in measured hydrogen sulfide levels and a health impact assessment undermined the credibilit­y of Infotox’s report on Enviroserv’s landfill in Shongweni.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa