Sunday Tribune

DEA denies change in law led to odour at Enviroserv site

-

WHILE Enviroserv acknowledg­es its Shongweni landfill site is a contributo­r to malodour, it blames the 2013 change in waste disposal regulation, which resulted in thousands of complaints from Upper Highway residents.

“Our investigat­ions indicate we now have sulphur-reducing bacterial activity which we believe is a consequenc­e of the ph which dropped after we started doing things according to the new regulation. But the department does not agree,” said treatment and disposal specialist Johan Schoonraad.

In August 2013, the Department of Environmen­tal Affairs instituted a new regulation which lowered the requisite ph level for disposing of waste, he said. Before December that year, Enviroserv used to douse the waste with lime to raise the ph levels to between 6 and 12, he added.

“We don’t blame the DEA because we were all consulted before the change of regulation but no one anticipate­d this kind of reaction. We all need to admit we adopted legislatio­n with a flaw. It needs to be corrected before other landfills suffer the same fate.”

Communitie­s allege the “toxic fumes” were making them and their pets ill, which Enviroserv disputes.

As a result of the mounting public complaints, the DEA in April suspended operations. This was also enforced by a Durban High Court order which was granted to the civil group, Upper Highway Air.

On Thursday, the Sunday Tribune was given an exclusive tour of the landfill where remedial and mitigation work was under way.

It was bustling with work on the micro-encapsulat­ion of stormwater and building the capping.

“Our site never had problems when we had a high ph. To remediate what is happening, we need to get good bacteria into the site to generate methane,” said group operations director Nico Vermeulen.

He said because of the suspension, it was faced with the challenge of having to tanker leachate to Gauteng as it cannot put it back onto the site.

He also expressed concerns over the large quantities of storm water on site which Enviroserv previously discharged at Cuttings Beach before ethekwini revoked its permission last year.

“Because of what we’ve experience­d, we’ve decided it’s better to go back to the old way of disposing of waste in all our landfills, so we are using lime to raise the ph level.”

A recent community health risk assessment commission­ed by Enviroserv alleged sulphur-dioxide (S02) was another contributo­r to the odorous problem but the culprit is said to be around Kwandengez­i township and not Shongweni.

“We are hoping the DEA will investigat­e this further because SO2 is not formed at the landfill as there are no combustion activities. But its health impacts are similar to some that have been reported, like asthma and sore throats.”

Environmen­talist Desmond D’sa said South Africa needed stricter laws to regulate the waste management industry because “some companies are getting away with murder, with no accountabi­lity.”

“We should be looking at ways to reduce waste otherwise companies like Enviroserv will always find excuses and then blame the government for deliberate­ly doing something they knew was wrong.”

D’sa said the DEA would not have instituted criminal proceeding­s against Enviroserv in February if it was its own regulation that was to blame for the “disaster” at Shongweni.

DEA spokespers­on Albi Modise said the odour was caused by poor management exacerbate­d by overloadin­g which promoted the growth of sulphur-reducing bacteria.

“It is not true the regulation­s caused the drop in ph. All landfills sites are bound by conditions of their licence and any deviation or non-compliance like that described above could result in malodour.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa