Sunday Tribune

BANKS ‘MASKING TRUTH’ ON CLOSURES

-

local branch once a fortnight, or who usually use it weekly but go on holiday several times a year are left out of the calculatio­ns.

Last year, Lloyds and RBS shut 439 outlets – and they are axing at least 519 more this year.

Campaigner­s last week accused the banks of trying to mask the truth about branches’ importance to justify savage cuts depriving rural communitie­s of vital services.

When they shut a branch, banks must reveal how many customers rely on it, under industry rules. They typically say the branches have only a handful of regular customers and are no longer cost-effective.

The pair’s approach is far more restrictiv­e than rival Barclays, which classifies someone as a regular customer if they use a branch just three times in a year.

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has repeatedly fought branch closures.

FSB chairman Mike Cherry said: “There are thousands of small firms who visit branches less frequently to cash cheques, access credit lines and set up new accounts, a lot of small business owners suddenly need access to in-person support at once in the event of a widespread online banking glitch, for example.

“The banks need to recognise the importance of these more infrequent visits.”

A spokesman for Lloyds said it published how many customers used a branch on a monthly and weekly basis, adding: “We use over 100 measures when assessing the impact of a branch closure. We are transparen­t about the reasons for closing a branch.”

An RBS spokesman said transactio­ns at branches in England and Wales were down 30% since 2014 and that the same period saw a 53% rise in the number of customers using mobile banking. – Daily Mail

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa