Sunday Tribune

‘Three power entities still state-owned’

- SAMKELO MTSHALI samkelo.mtshali@inl.co.za

THE division of Eskom into three entities should not be seen as privatisat­ion of the indebted electricit­y supplier, an energy expert says.

But trade unions have promised a fight to the end and say they will not allow the unbundling of the stateowned power utility.

President Cyril Ramaphosa announced, during his State of the Nation Address, that Eskom would be divided into three entities for generation, transmissi­on and distributi­on.

Chris Yelland, an energy expert, said this was a good move and an important first step in the restructur­ing of the state-owned enterprise because it would lead to the establishm­ent of three companies owned by Eskom as subsidiari­es of Eskom Holdings.

“This cannot be seen as privatisat­ion because Eskom is owned by the state and the state will be the owner of the three subsidiari­es,” Yelland said.

He said it was an important step that the establishm­ent of a separate, independen­t, system and market operator would see the state as the shareholde­r, and not Eskom.

“This can’t be seen as privatisat­ion because these separate companies will be owned by the state,” Yelland said.

However, National Union of Mineworker­s (NUM) general secretary David Sipunzi said that its members and other workers at Eskom were totally opposed to the privatisat­ion of the power utility to enrich a few elites.

“NUM is against any attempt to unbundle Eskom. It is the privatisat­ion of Eskom to enrich the elites. It is not about saving costs. We, therefore, call upon the government to reconsider its position because it is anti-working class and the poor,” he said.

“It will result in electricit­y being expensive and it will be unaffordab­le for the poor. The NUM is going to fight tooth-and-nail against the unbundling of Eskom,” said Sipunzi.

SA Communist Party spokespers­on Alex Mashilo said the party did not want to confine itself on whether the president was right or wrong to break the power utility into three entities.

“Ours is to focus on core principles, and those are that we don’t want workers at Eskom to be retrenched. We also want Eskom to remain, in its entirety, fully owned by the state on behalf of the people as a whole to serve its developmen­tal mandate.

“Eskom is heavily indebted and its debt is in the region of R400 billion, and there definitely needs to be an improvemen­t at Eskom in terms of administra­tion, governance, management, operationa­l efficiency and organisati­onal effectiven­ess,” Mashilo said.

He said that this would ensure that Eskom was reposition­ed and saved from going under because if the power utility did go under, South Africa would not forgive itself as a nation.

“Nobody will be forgiven and we must not wait for that moment,” Mashilo said.

DA national spokespers­on Solly Malatsi said Ramaphosa’s move was something that the DA had advocated.

“We are glad that the president has finally adopted a DA policy by breaking down Eskom into different entities,” said Malatsi.

 ?? Bloomberg NADINE HUTTON ?? THE POWER play of trade unions NUM and Numsa over President Cyril Ramaphosa’s announceme­nt of the unbundling of debt-ridden Eskom into three separate entities is unfounded as Eskom Holdings will still remain state-owned, says energy expert Chris Yelland.|
Bloomberg NADINE HUTTON THE POWER play of trade unions NUM and Numsa over President Cyril Ramaphosa’s announceme­nt of the unbundling of debt-ridden Eskom into three separate entities is unfounded as Eskom Holdings will still remain state-owned, says energy expert Chris Yelland.|

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa