Sunday Tribune

The Public Protector is silent when SA needs her most

-

DAMNING revelation­s emerge daily of the true scale and extent of state capture in the executive and our state-owned enterprise­s by the Gupta-zuma network.

As a consequenc­e of each new e-mail and allegation break, it is pertinent to ask: where is our Public Protector?

In the midst of this scandal Ms Busisiwe Mkwhebane seems to be missing in action, maintainin­g a strangely stoic silence. This is odd as chapter seven of the Public Protector Act empowers the office to conduct an investigat­ion on her initiative. Why has she not acted on even one of the allegation­s, of abuse of office by a single minister or public official, to have emerged in recent weeks?

It’s the Public Protector’s constituti­onal obligation to investigat­e any conduct in state affairs or the public administra­tion that is “alleged or suspected to be improper, or to result in any impropriet­y or prejudice”. The latest scandal surely ticks all those boxes.

Much public scepticism heralded Mkwhebane’s appointmen­t. So far, her inaction has done nothing but prove her critics right.

South Africans need a strong Public Protector who is going to stand up for the constituti­on and what is right, not a patsy who kowtows to the executive.

JOHN STEENHUISE­N DA Chief Whip, MP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa