Trump’s tweets raise Kim’s ire
MISSILE POWER: WOULD US ATTACK NORTH KOREA?
Strikes on Syria and Afghanistan send the signal that US may unleash firepower.
Geopolitical tensions flare every spring on the Korean peninsula, but analysts say the anxiety of recent weeks has been magnified by the unpredictable new player in the annual drama: Donald Trump.
North Korea always intensifies its rhetoric when Seoul and Washington stage annual largescale joint military drills that it condemns as rehearsals for a potential invasion.
But this time threat and counter-threat from both sides sent tensions spiralling, generating lurid headlines and focusing global attention on the region.
The North says it needs nuclear weapons to protect itself and observers agree it is making progress towards a long-dreamt-of rocket capable of delivering a warhead to the US mainland.
With multiple sets of UN sanctions failing to quell its ambitions, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson last month said US military action was an “option on the table”.
Pyongyang promised “the toughest counteraction” to any attack while Washington pledged an “overwhelming response”, with Trump himself tweeting that the North “will be taken care of”.
Even so, the North has carried out two rocket tests this month alone and paraded its arsenal, including a suspected new intercontinental ballistic missile, through the streets of Pyongyang.
Speculation has also mounted that it could carry out a sixth nuclear test, following two last year.
But cooler heads prevailed in Washington and the two sides never came to blows. Analysts now point to the new US administration as a key factor behind the intense fears of conflict this time.
“The big change was from Washington,” said Koo Kab-Woo, professor at the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul.
After years of “strategic patience” under Barack Obama, he said the US is “reacting more sensitively” to claims by leader Kim Jong-Un Kim that his country is in the final stages of developing an intercontinental ballistic missile.
A missile strike in Syria and the dropping of the “Mother of All Bombs” in Afghanistan sent ominous signals that the new administration is prepared to unleash US firepower.
And after a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump vowed to act unilaterally against Pyongyang if Beijing fails to rein in its unpredictable ally.
“The ascendancy of Donald Trump introduces a greater element of uncertainty about America’s moves,” said Mark Fitzpatrick, executive director at the International Institute of Strategic Studies in Washington.
“His threatening tweets make people wonder whether he would also attack North Korea.”
The North itself is renowned for belligerent statements.
Mason Richey of Hankuk University of Foreign Affairs in Seoul described its propaganda as “ranging from insulting to bellicose to ludicrous”, but found no correlation between the North’s verbal hostility and its actual actions.
“US civilian and military decision-makers should greatly discount North Korea’s threat rhetoric” unless it is accompanied by other signals, he said. –