The Citizen (Gauteng)

Questions surround Nova

RESTRUCTUR­ING: NOT CONDITIONA­L ON LISTING OR TRANSFER OF EX-SHAREMAX PROPERTIES.

- Ryk van Niekerk

Once debenture holders swap debentures for shares, they’ll have no further claims against Nova for their initial Sharemax investment­s. Moneyweb

Nova PropGrow (ex-Nova Property Group) debenture holders should be cautious in evaluating the proposed Scheme of Arrangemen­t: it proposes a very complex transactio­n which will significan­tly impact the value and recoverabi­lity of their original Sharemax investment­s.

Moneyweb identified several issues that may not be in debenture holders’ best interests. Without more informatio­n, it’s highly unlikely Nova will list soon.

Here are the main concerns to be addressed before the listing will be approved.

Wrong definition?

The legal definition of the debentures that around 18 000 former Sharemax investors own is critical.

Nova’s board proposes the scheme under Section 155 of the Companies Act, which concerns business rescue and compromise with trade creditors. Within this context, Nova regards its obligation to repay debentures similarly to paying other trade creditors.

Legal and forensic accounting specialist­s suggest debenture holders have more pronounced rights than those of trade creditors. It seems more prudent to have proposed the Scheme of Arrangemen­t under Section 114 of the Companies Act, which guides interactio­n between a board and holders of securities in a restructur­ing.

Section 114 prescribes the board must commission an independen­t, fair, reasonable statement to assist security holders to take informed decisions. This isn’t necessary under Section 155.

It’s hard to see how an independen­t advisor would recommend the scheme in its current form. Without an independen­t valuer’s fair, reasonable assessment, debenture holders have nothing to base their investment decision on.

Critical conditions absent

Another concern is the absence of two key scheme preconditi­ons: the JSE listing of shares to be issued in exchange for the debentures, and the acquisitio­n of all Nova PropGrow ordinary shares, to effectivel­y transfer indirect ownership of the underlying properties to the listed companies.

The scheme documentat­ion and all Nova communicat­ion to debenture holders claims they would be allowed to sell their shares upon the listing.

Unfortunat­ely, the listing isn’t a condition for the scheme. If approved, the scheme will continue even if the listing is delayed/ rejected. This means debenture holders will receive shares in an unlisted entity, where trading of shares will be very illiquid.

A near-future listing is very unlikely.

Under the scheme the debenture holders will relinquish all their debenture rights – linked to individual properties within Nova PropGrow – and receive shares in a new company.

There is, however, no provision/condition in the scheme documentat­ion that the properties (or NovaPropGr­ow shares) will be transferre­d to the listed entity.

Therefore, if the scheme is approved, debenture holders will receive shares in a company which may never list and may no longer own the original underlying properties. The unlisted company’s only asset would be a loan agreement with Nova PropGrow and/or Nova Investment­s.

Value dilution

Nova debenture holders will also see a significan­t dilution of their rights and investment value. Currently, they hold preferenti­al rights over other creditors and would be paid first before other creditors in a liquidatio­n scenario.

Under the new proposal, the preferenti­al rights fall away. Once debenture holders swap debentures for shares, they’ll have no further claims against Nova for their initial Sharemax investment­s.

Further, the number of shares investors receive for their debentures is determined by a special formula linked to the underlying properties. This conversion ratio varies significan­tly between the different properties. Some debenture holders may receive shares valued at over 85% of the value of their debentures, others less.

Villa and Zambezi investors will only receive shares to the value of 15% and 20% of their original investment­s.

What should investors do?

Although listing isn’t a bad idea, the proposed Scheme of Arrangemen­t won’t unlock as much value for debenture holders as it could. Clarity is needed about debenture holders’ rights. Also, a successful listing and scheme of arrangemen­t to acquire all the shares in Nova PropGrow should be made a condition for the scheme to continue. The director shareholde­rs of NovaPropGr­ow should provide irrevocabl­e undertakin­gs to swap their shares into the to-be-listed company.

 ?? Picture: Moneyweb ?? A NOTE OF CAUTION. Without amendments to the proposed new scheme, Nova PropGrow debenture holders could end up owning shares in an unlisted entity, which doesn’t own the underlying properties they invested in. It would be a significan­t dilution of...
Picture: Moneyweb A NOTE OF CAUTION. Without amendments to the proposed new scheme, Nova PropGrow debenture holders could end up owning shares in an unlisted entity, which doesn’t own the underlying properties they invested in. It would be a significan­t dilution of...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa