The Citizen (Gauteng)

‘Charge the lot’

Former CEO Tshediso Matona exposes the rot at Eskom in a statement in parliament, describing shady dealings and portraying an ill-functionin­g state institutio­n debilitate­d by state capture.

- Yadhana Jadoo yadhanaj@citizen.co.za

NPA has more than enough evidence to act, says Outa chairperso­n.

The rot at Eskom was exposed yesterday for all to see – and for civil society to ask the National Prosecutin­g Authority: what more do you need to act? A hard-hitting statement by former Eskom CEO Tshediso Matona in parliament on shady dealings within the power utility portrayed an ill-functionin­g state institutio­n marred by state capture.

Matona yesterday told parliament’s public enterprise­s committee, conducting an inquiry into state capture at state-owned enterprise­s (SOEs), that there had been deep infighting among the Eskom board during his tenure as CEO, from October 2014 to March 2015.

In presenting evidence to the committee, Matona said that a day before he was suspended, he was asked to leave a board meeting by Public Enterprise­s Minister Lynne Brown – and that was when he realised “something was amiss” within the power utility.

That meeting, he said, saw the then and new Eskom board asking for an inquiry into dealings at the utility. This had been conducted but the report was never released.

Following his evidence, the Organisati­on Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) called for Brown to be taken to task for not addressing all the issues at Eskom

“We are not surprised. More revelation­s are coming out of a defunct organisati­on that is being captured,” Outa chairperso­n Wayne Duvenage said.

“This is part of the captured strategy of the connected people to the president and the plundering that took place. It is also the enabling of Gupta-related organisati­ons to benefit from stateowned entities, which is more proof this occurred,” he added.

“We sit here saying to the National Prosecutin­g Authority, what more do you need to act? You have got all the evidence, you have witnesses, you have affidavits … what more do you need to now go and start questionin­g, arresting and holding people to account?”

He added that while there were those who had already been fingered in the looting that was state capture, there were some still working at the power utility who needed to be brought to book.

“Minister Brown is now part of the problem. She’s not taking action. She took a long time to act and had a lot of evidence and informatio­n to fire Brian Molefe, Mochela Koko, Anoj Singh, Ben Ngubane … all of them!

“It took relentless exposés … but there are still more people that are there and that shouldn’t be there. She is not taking the hard action that she has to take.

“In this case, Brown is implicated and she is part of the problem. I think if we had a president that was worth his salt, he would take action against her.”

But he would not, Duvenage added, “because he is keeping his people who are looking after his connected cronies in power so they slow down the process of investigat­ion and the action that should be taken”.

Duvenage said looting within SOEs and the recent R50.8 billion revenue shortfall announced by Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba translated into a society that was not comfortabl­e with state institutio­ns such as Eskom and the South African Revenue Ser- vice (Sars). Gigaba yesterday announced he had appointed a tax administra­tion and governance inquiry into Sars.

“Nothing is done to curb these expenses, questionin­g them and go right to the source.

“This is the work that [former and deputy finance ministers] Pravin Gordhan and Mcebisi Jonas had been doing. That good work has slowed right down. And now we have a minister who pays lip service.”

Former Eskom executive Erica Johnson told the committee she was disturbed by a New Age breakfast media deal which would have eventually cost R14 million per year. –

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa