The Citizen (Gauteng)

‘Shaun has done nothing wrong’

JUDGE: NXASANA ASKED FOR GOLDEN HANDSHAKE AND GOT IT

- Ilse de Lange ilsedl@citizen.co.za

But rights organisati­ons want Abrahams out and R17.3m settlement repaid.

The High Court in Pretoria has expressed concern about a bid by rights organisati­ons to reinstate Mxolisi Nxasana as national director of public prosecutio­ns (NDPP) and to oust Shaun Abrahams, “who has done nothing wrong”.

Referring to a 2015 settlement agreement between President Jacob Zuma and Nxasana in terms of which he received a golden handshake of R17.3 million in exchange for vacating his position, Judge President Dunstan Mlambo wanted to know from Matthew Chaskalson, counsel for Corruption Watch, if Abrahams was not the victim of an unlawful decision.

“What will happen to the current NDPP? There is a seated NDPP and he is innocent. He has done nothing wrong. Mr Abrahams was appointed in a supposed vacant position.

“Nxasana named his price. He said ‘I didn’t want to go. I’ll only go if you pay me’ and he got his price. On a purely fairness basis, how can you oust Mr Abrahams?” Judge Mlambo wanted to know.

Chaskalson argued if Nxasana’s removal was unconstitu­tional, Abrahams’ appointmen­t must be voided as one could not be appointed in an occupied position.

Corruption Watch, Freedom Under Law and the Council for the Advancemen­t of the South African Constituti­on want the court to set aside Nxasana’s removal from office and order him to repay the R17.3 million golden handshake he received.

They also want the court to declare that Nxasana still holds office.

In addition, they have asked the court to declare that Zuma has a confl ict of interest as he faces criminal charges and that he may not take decisions relating to the appointmen­t, removal or suspension of an NDPP.

The court yesterday turned down Nxasana’s answering affidavit – fi led more than a year late – in which he contradict­ed the president’s claim that he had asked to resign because of confl ict within the NPA.

Chaskalson argued it was contrary to public policy to allow the president to get rid of a troublesom­e NDPP by offering him an obscene amount of public money.

He said the settlement with Nxasana was clearly invalid and even the president admitted it. –

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa