The Citizen (Gauteng)

Resolution­s: price and gain

ABSENCE VS PLENTY: COUNT THE SACRIFICES A life of less could go further in creating a healthy financial position, with the odd luxury thrown in as well.

- Ingé Lamprecht Moneyweb

At the start of a new year, it’s common to plan ahead and compile New Year’s resolution­s. Each financial resolution has an opportunit­y cost, but the choice isn’t always clear cut. To evaluate the opportunit­y cost, start with a comprehens­ive budget, listing all your income and expenses. Are there prospects to increase your income in 2018? What would you have to sacrifice to do so?

Are there opportunit­ies to lower your expenses? Commentato­rs often recommend cutting down discretion­ary or variable spending – reducing restaurant visits and spending less on new clothes.

You can derive great long-term benefits from buying a reasonably priced, slightly smaller home or vehicle from the outset. These two items in particular are like magnets for extra expenses. Buying a bigger, more expensive house in an exclusive suburb attracts higher interest payments, insurance premiums, rates bills and maintenanc­e costs. The same is true for cars.

A friend recently argued that the vast majority of people can’t “afford” to live in a large, luxurious house, to buy expensive cars and to go overseas every year. For most people, even relatively wealthy ones, managing their finances sensibly and responsibl­y will mean they can only choose one – perhaps two of these if they’re fortunate.

While he didn’t suggest it’s impossible to live a life where all these things are present, he was saying that the “opportunit­y cost” of having all these things would be extremely high – so high it arguably won’t be worth the sacrifice or added financial stress.

A successful tech businessma­n once said it’s almost impossible to be an entreprene­ur if you have to finance a high-flying lifestyle. It’s much easier to navigate rough patches if there aren’t piles of debt and significan­t bills to be paid each month.

This is true even for salaried individual­s. Society places a high premium on status and career success to earn more money to finance a life of abundance.

But a life of absence can go much further in creating a balanced financial position that may still include a “luxury” or two.

A life of absence – without unnecessar­y debt and other suffocatin­g financial obligation­s – also translates into greater flexibilit­y … to take time off, attend university, take a lower-paying but more meaningful job, or create a financial buffer to help navigate tough financial periods.

The risk with a column like this one is that it creates the impression that debt is bad, spending ill-advised and that you should aim to live like a pauper while hoarding as much as you can.

Rather, it’s about truly considerin­g the opportunit­y cost of financial and lifestyle decisions: Is the sacrifice truly worth the long-term gain? Is it worthwhile, in the long term, to cash out your pension to pay for an overseas holiday?

Is a bigger house worth the additional debt and interest payments?

The sacrifices may not only be monetary – less time with family, more stress.

 ?? Picture: Reuters ?? NO BLONDE. Britney Spears didn’t go to university, because doing so would have meant giving up a very lucrative singing career. The opportunit­y cost – the next best alternativ­e she sacrificed by singing – was a university degree.
Picture: Reuters NO BLONDE. Britney Spears didn’t go to university, because doing so would have meant giving up a very lucrative singing career. The opportunit­y cost – the next best alternativ­e she sacrificed by singing – was a university degree.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa