The Citizen (Gauteng)

Capitec: Viceroy sticks to its guns

STEELING ITSELF: MORE ATTACKS COMING, SAYS BANK

- Prinesha Naidoo

Capitec dismisses Viceroy’s latest report, questionin­g its reporting and lending practices and Reserve Bank support of it.

Initial report is ‘fundamenta­lly flawed, misleading’.

Capitec has dismissed Viceroy’s latest report, in which its reporting and lending practices and the SA Reserve Bank’s (Sarb’s) support for the lender are questioned.

“Shareholde­rs can expect the release of fresh attacks and false allegation­s over an extended period. Capitec consequent­ly advises shareholde­rs to use caution when reacting to such allegation­s,” the group stated on Monday.

The Sens statement follows a new Viceroy report, which suggests Sarb has yet to perform an “adequate regulatory inspection of Capitec”, after Sarb affirmed the safety and soundness of the lender last week.

Viceroy’s initial report on Capitec recommende­d it be placed under immediate curatorshi­p and caused its shares to fall almost 25% in intraday trade. Sarb then stated: “… As part of our mandate, we monitor the safety and soundness of all banks, including Capitec Bank Limited [Capitec]. According to all the informatio­n available, Capitec is solvent, well capitalise­d and has adequate liquidity. The bank meets all prudential requiremen­ts.”

Almost a week later, the researcher­s have questioned Sarb’s show of support for Capitec. To Viceroy, Sarb’s use of “according to all the informatio­n available” suggests it has yet to perform an “adequate regulatory inspection of Capitec”.

Sarb “has a responsibi­lity to determine whether the informatio­n provided to them – and on which they base their regulatory decisions is accurate. We do not think it is. The Sarb has, at this point, a responsibi­lity to perform a full regulatory inspection of Capitec. Viceroy remains firm in its belief that this will result in [the] Sarb placing Capitec into curatorshi­p,” it said.

Viceroy alleges that Capitec’s balance sheet, income and solvency numbers are unreliable and that it is underrepre­senting losses “to pretend that uncontroll­able loans are collectabl­e and still accruing income”.

Capitec pointed out flaws in Viceroy’s methodolog­y, calculatio­ns and data use. It said Viceroy’s estimates that 1.3% of its 61- to 84-month clients are in arrears is too low should, taking the group’s strict write-off policy into account, be 6.3%. Of the 6.3%, 40% were rehabilita­ted by February 28, 2017, it added.

One analyst at a prominent asset manager said Viceroy’s latest report “draws the wrong conclusion based on a wrong calculatio­n and selective data”. The analyst’s calculatio­ns, shared with Moneyweb before Capitec’s statement, supported that of the bank.

Earlier on Monday, the bank issued another Sens statement, labelling Viceroy’s initial report, which claimed that its loan book is “massively overstated” and that it’s fabricatin­g new loans and collection­s, as “fundamenta­lly flawed and misleading”.

Capitec categorica­lly denied and provided evidence against Viceroy’s allegation­s that its loan book is irreconcil­able and misreprese­nted and refuted allegation­s of an overstatem­ent of R11 billion, stating that no adjustment was required. It has also denied that it rolls unpaid loans and charges initiation fees when rescheduli­ng loans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa