The Citizen (Gauteng)

Mine permit was ‘state capture fix’

IN PROTECTED AREA: ZUMA FAMILY ARE INVOLVED

- Ilse de Lange ilsedl@citizen.co.za

Coalition is challengin­g permission granted by ministers.

Coal mining in the Mabola Protected Area would have a devastatin­g effect on the clean water supply to millions of people in Gauteng, other parts of South Africa and beyond for decades to come, a coalition of civil society organisati­ons is arguing in the High Court in Pretoria.

The applicatio­n by the coalition, represente­d by the Centre for Environmen­tal Rights, aimed at stopping Atha-Africa Ventures (Atha0 from mining in the protected environmen­t outside Wakkerstro­om in Mpumalanga proceeded yesterday.

This was after Judge Norman Davis turned down Mpumalanga environmen­t MEC Vusi Shongwe’s bid to postpone the applicatio­n indefinite­ly.

Mabola is part of one of 21 strategic water resource areas which together form the catchments for 50% of the country’s fresh water supply.

Last week, Shongwe published a notice of his intention to exclude the properties comprising the area of the proposed mine from the protected area. He said in an affidavit he had decided on this after receiving a petition signed by 8 500 community members. In it, they said inclusion in the protected area had caused a developmen­t freeze in a poor community which urgently needed jobs.

The coalition opposed Shongwe’s applicatio­n, which they described as an abuse of power and a cynical attempt to get around their applicatio­n. The coalition’s advocate, Alan Dodson, pointed out that Atha’s black economic empowermen­t (BEE) partners included former president Jacob Zuma’s nephews, Vincent and Sizwe. “We are in a country that has been literally ravaged ... by corruption and capture and manipulati­on of state institutio­ns.

“The potential for corruption in relation to authorisat­ions to mine is huge. The BEE partners of Atha include family of the former president of SA. There was a compelling need for environmen­tal decision-making that stood to benefit such connected individual­s openly,” he said.

He argued that the primary beneficiar­ies of the mine would be based offshore and nothing suggested they would still be in South Africa to live up to their environmen­tal responsibi­lities once they had earned massive profits and closed the mine.

Dodson submitted that the ministers had done everything possible to hide what they were doing and throw environmen­tal organisati­ons off their tracks. Thus, the coalition had only learned of their decision by chance. –

Mmusi Maimane DA leader

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa