The Citizen (Gauteng)

DA applicatio­n ‘a vendetta’

BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE: BEING USED BY THE PARTY AS A ‘WHIPPING BOY’

- Ilse de Lange ilsedl@citizen.co.za

Bid to remove public protector unwarrante­d, says legal team.

The Democratic Alliance does not like Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane, wanted to remove her from office, and was using the court to get it’s way, her legal team has argued.

Judge Ronel Tolmay yesterday reserved judgment in an applicatio­n by the DA and the Council for the Advancemen­t of the South African Constituti­on (Casac) to set aside Mkhwebane’s report on the controvers­ial failed Vrede Dairy Project.

They also asked the court to declare that Mkhwebane had failed in her constituti­onal and statutory duties by not properly investigat­ing the DA’s complaints about the multi-million-rand project and sought a personal punitive costs order against her.

Mkhwebane found there were gross irregulari­ties, negligence and maladminis­tration in the project and recommende­d that Free State Premier Ace Magashule institute action against the implicated officials but did not investigat­e alleged links between the project and the Gupta family, claiming budgetary constraint­s.

The DA has accused Mkhwebane of whitewashi­ng her report to protect Magashule, former Free State agricultur­e MEC Mosebenzi Zwane and the Gupta family following a series of media reports alleging the Gupta family and not disadvanta­ged Free State farmers were the main beneficiar­ies of the project.

A legal team of two senior and two junior advocates represente­d Mkhwebane in court, arguing that she had done nothing wrong, that the applicatio­n was politicall­y motivated and part of the DA’s vendetta against her and that the attack on her was unfair, unwarrante­d and intolerabl­e.

Tolmay wanted to know why Mkhwebane needed two legal teams and why the public had to pay for it, but was assured that “time constraint­s” made it necessary.

One of her senior advocates, Vuyani Ngalwana, argued that the applicatio­n was not about the public protector but about the DA, who wanted the court to act as its conduit.

He said politician­s should fight their battles in the National Assembly and the DA should not use Mkhwebane as a “whipping boy” for issues that should be determined in the legislativ­e.

“If the Democratic Alliance wants to govern in the Free State, they must compete politicall­y in that province,” he said, adding that the court should not aid the DA’s political project by setting the report aside. –

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa