The Citizen (Gauteng)

Crossing over to the wild side

MITSUBISHI: POPULAR ECLIPSE CROSS GIVEN SOME OOMPH IN THE FORM OF TURBO MODEL

- Jaco van der Merwe

CVT does not do justice to engine that features generous enhancemen­ts.

Just when you think the sports utility vehicle/ crossover segment is too saturated, you get a reminder of the motoring public’s insatiable thirst for its preferred body shape.

Having entrenched itself in the local market over decades as a trusted name renowned for its tough-as-nails durability across a range of SUVs and bakkies, Mitsubishi in 2019 broke away from its more traditiona­lly styled products to something more eye-catching. Windgat, if you must.

Following the global trend, the three-diamond brand introduced the Eclipse Cross, a crossover SUV that price-wise slots in above the more traditiona­l ASX and under the Outlander, Pajero Sport and Pajero.

With its unique rear design and competitiv­e price tag, it did not take long for the Eclipse Cross to become a hit in SA, outselling the manufactur­er’s other offerings – including the new Triton – for most months since its launch early last year. And the Eclipse Cross achieved this feat with only two models in its line-up, the front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, both featuring the 2.0-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine that also does duty in the ASX.

In an effort to further build on that success, Mitsubishi has recently introduced a third model, the Eclipse Cross Turbo.

This derivative became the manufactur­er’s first car to feature the Japanese carmaker’s new all-aluminium, MIVEC 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo engine. Like its two 2.0-litre siblings, the Turbo’s powerplant is mated to a CVT.

The 1.5-litre engine produces the exact same power output as the 2.0-litre – 110kW – but that is the only common denominato­r.

On the torque front. the Turbo is up by 52Nm to produce a total of 250Nm which is on tap between 2 000 to 3 500rpm.

Mitsubishi claims the Turbo reaches 100km/h from a standstill in 8.9sec compared to the 2.0-litre’s very pedestrian time of 12.1sec, carbon emissions are down from 184 to 174g/km and the fuel consumptio­n is rated at 7.7l/100km, which is marginally better than the 2.0-litre’s 7.9l/100km.

These improvemen­ts come at a premium of course, with the Turbo at R459 995 a full R50k more expensive than the front-wheel drive 2.0-litre derivative.

But should the lack of spice under the bonnet be the thing that put you off the 2.0-litre, the

Turbo’s upgrade in performanc­e is worth the extra R1 000-odd in your monthly instalment.

I have not driven the 2.0-litre Eclipse Cross, but have experience­d this powertrain in the ASX. And after spending a few days in the Eclipse Cross Turbo, I can safely say that the difference between the two powerplant­s is huge. As Mitsubishi’s numbers indicate, accelerati­on is much improved which makes overtaking easier.

The extra torque sent to the front wheels at lower to mid speeds is, in fact, so much that it can easily result in wheel spin, especially in Sport Mode. This is a bit hooligan for a car which leans more towards sophistica­tion given the modern styling and elegant interior.

We also found the Turbo’s handling quite solid and rigid, even though cornering and braking at higher speeds sometimes felt as if the car wasn’t designed from the ground up with the extra punch of the turbo engine in mind.

What did not amuse us was the CVT. Even though Mitsubishi says that the eight-step transmissi­on was specially designed for this model, the extra power brings the worst out of the transmissi­on.

Where you are prepared to accept the constant gear hunting and indecision you would usually associate with powered-down models, these problems still persist in the Turbo, to a point where you start cringing at the engine noise convinced that a generously powered engine shouldn’t be revved that hard to get results.

The Turbo does feature paddle shifters behind the steering wheel to enable you to do your own “shifts’’, but this shouldn’t lure you into a false belief that you’ll have an all-out sportier manual experience. We like to take the view that it will purely help ease your pain when the CVT gets too annoying for your liking.

As far as fuel consumptio­n goes, we managed to average 9.5l/100km which was a bit disappoint­ing as most of the 300km we covered was cruising under the speed limit on the highway.

Apart from the engine, the only other thing the Turbo offers from its siblings is the carbon fibre door inserts, which does complement a very elegant and comfortabl­e interior. On the outside, the Turbo looks similar to its siblings with the front-end featuring Mitsubishi’s Dynamic Shield design and the distinctiv­e feature at the back the spoiler with an integrated high-level brake light splitting the rear window.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa