The Citizen (Gauteng)

‘No will to fight graft’

EVIDENCE: EX-PARLIAMENT CHAIR TELLS OF GOVERNMENT MISMANAGEM­ENT

- Simnikiwe Hlatshanen­i – simnikiweh@citizen.co.za

Commission hears some supply chain officials at SOEs refuse to be vetted.

The fight against corruption, dating back to 2005, was marred by unwilling political leaders, officials and state institutio­ns who refused to do their jobs.

This was heard in evidence presented by former chair of parliament’s standing committee on public accounts (Scopa), Themba Godi, during his testimony at the Commission of Inquiry into State Capture yesterday.

Godi did not mince his words about the chain of events which led to a gross lack of oversight over government’s financial management systems.

In 2014, the national executive took a decision that all supply chain management personnel throughout all government institutio­ns must be vetted.

This was to ensure that the country’s budget was always handled by people whose integrity had already been tested. However, this was not done, said Godi.

The commission also heard that some supply chain management officials at state-owned enterprise­s refused to be vetted.

“When we called the State Security Agency, they said the regulation­s they have make it optional and so when they tried to vet the employees at SABC and Saps [South African Police Service], Transnet and SAA [South African Airways], they all refused and the whole thing stopped. So we

If vetting had been on personnel maybe we could have identified dubious characters.

are saying if vetting had been on personnel, maybe we could have identified dubious characters,” he added.

Godi also related a story of an interminis­terial anticorrup­tion task team which was formed in 2010 and chaired by then justice minister Jeff Radebe, a tale of a complete failure to launch.

“Seeing the rising levels of corruption, we called that task team and what we found was a very disorganis­ed and dysfunctio­nal structure which should have been the government’s spear in fighting corruption. Out of 42 cases, about 40 were all resolved through plea bargaining.”

A history of such lenient punishment for stealing millions from government meant that the team’s goal of fighting corruption was never reached.

“A person who has misused or caused the loss of millions of rands [such as] R50 million, R60 million, R100 million got a five-year suspended sentence and fined R20 000 or R30 000. That can hardly cause the corrupt to pause and step back.”

A 2005 decision by government to create an integrated financial management system through modernisat­ion did not have a business case until last year, the commission also heard.

This modernisat­ion would have allowed for the full automation of auditing and monitoring systems, lifting government out of its antiquated paper system, which saw hundreds of important financial documents lost to the department of health during the Bank of Lisbon fire in Johannesbu­rg in 2018.

“The business case was only done in 2020 and in between, there has been so much mismanagem­ent stopping and starting the process,” said Godi.

“There has been a forensic investigat­ion that cost about R4.7 million and no action has been taken against officials. If government had managed that system well, we would not be sitting here.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa