Bill ‘will limit property rights’

NO COMPENSATION: FARMERS OPPOSE SOME CLAUSES

Zimbabwe cited as example where expropriation leads to large-scale ruin.

Free State Agriculture (FSA) remains vehemently opposed to certain clauses in the Expropriation Bill and questions government’s sincerity with regard to the issue of land expropriation and ownership, according to Francois Wilken, FSA president.

Following the recent publication of government’s land policy, he said the new Expropriation Bill posed a real threat to all South Africans’ rights to own property.

“It is important to understand that the stated aims of the new Expropriation Bill are to allow the state to target and expropriate any property without compensation. In other words, through this legislation, government does not seek to expand property rights, it seeks to limit it.”

According to Wilken, government did not need the Bill in its current format to expand the base of private land ownership in South Africa.

If broad land ownership was a priority for government, it needed to start a process of transferring the ownership of the 5 300 state-owned farms to previously disadvantaged individual beneficiaries, he said.

Wilken said the Bill would not address these challenges; it would merely destroy the rights of the rightful landowners and the livelihoods of farmworkers and rural communities.

FSA is preparing a full report to serve as the organisation’s response to governments call for comments on the Bill. “FSA believes that property rights should be expanded to all South Africans. The Expropriation Bill will limit, if not destroy, this right that’s central to job creation and economic growth,” Wilken stressed.

Meanwhile, Dr John Purchase, chief executive of Agbiz, said he did not know of any instance elsewhere in the world where expropriation without compensation was successfully implemented and quoted Zimbabwe, Venezuela and Nazi Germany as examples where it led to large-scale ruin.

–

Govt does not seek to expand property rights