The Citizen (KZN)

Trump’s travel ban blocked

IT VIOLATES FEDERAL IMMIGRATIO­N LAW AND NOT ‘DETRIMENTA­L’ TO US INTERESTS White House calls ruling ‘dangerousl­y flawed’.

- San Francisco

AUS judge blocked President Donald Trump’s latest bid to impose restrictio­ns on citizens from several countries entering the United States, which would have taken effect this week.

The open-ended ban, announced last month, targeted people from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea, as well as certain government officials from Venezuela.

It was the third version of a policy that had previously targeted some Muslim-majority countries.

Tuesday’s ruling sets up another high-stakes battle over Trump’s executive authority.

Trump’s first travel ban, in January, caused chaos and protests at US airports before judges halted it. The state of Hawaii sued to block the latest travel restrictio­ns, arguing that federal immigratio­n law did not give him the authority to impose them on six of those countries.

US District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu said Hawaii was likely to succeed in proving that Trump’s latest travel ban violates federal immigratio­n law.

The policy “suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecesso­r: it lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be ‘detrimenta­l to the interests of the United States’,” Watson wrote.

The White House in a statement said the ruling was “dangerousl­y flawed” and that it was confident the courts would ultimately uphold Trump’s policy.

“These restrictio­ns are vital to ensuring that foreign nations comply with the minimum security standards required for the integrity of our immigratio­n system and the security of our nation,” the statement said.

The justice department called Watson’s ruling “incorrect” and said it would appeal. –

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa