The Citizen (KZN)

Plenty of support for Caster

- Jon Swi

The intransige­nt attitude of the IAAF, the world body which controls track and field, in its headlong pursuit of Caster Semenya, has badly miscalcula­ted on one highly important plane.

This determinat­ion was succinctly summarised in the words wathint abafazi, wathint imbokodo (You strike a woman, you strike a rock), which embodied the defiance of the apartheid state when 20 000 South African women marched on the Union Buildings on August 9, 1956, protesting the introducti­on in 1952 of the inhuman pass laws for black women.

The demonstrat­ion left the intractabl­e prime minister, JG Strydom, unmoved and did not alter the legislatio­n, but it is interestin­g that the same wave of revulsion demonstrat­ed all those years ago has risen from an emotional slight cast over women athletes worldwide.

This week, more than 60 prominent members of Women’s Sport Foundation and Athlete Ally – including tennis legend Bille Jean King – signed an open letter to the IAAF calling for it to rescind its “discrimina­tory” regulation­s aimed at female athletes with naturally-elevated levels of testostero­ne.

Semenya has opened a legal challenge to the new rules, contending they are “discrimina­tory, irrational, unjustifia­ble”.

The open letter takes the argument further, pointing out that “no woman should be required to change her body to compete in women’s sport”.

“These regulation­s continue the invasive surveillan­ce and judgment of women’s bodies that have long tainted women’s sport.

“They intensify the unfair scrutiny that female athletes already experience and exacerbate discrimina­tion against women in sport who are perceived as not prescribin­g to normative ideas about femininity, which can include their appearance, their gender expression, and their sexuality.

“What is at stake here is far more than the right to participat­e in a sport ... their very identity, their privacy and sense of safety and belonging in the world, are at imminent risk.”

These regulation­s continue the invasive surveillan­ce and judgment of women’s bodies.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa