The Citizen (KZN)

Crashed jet was ‘not airworthy’

IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN GROUNDED DAY BEFORE Anti-stall system procedure also not included in operating manual of new 737.

- Jakarta

ALion Air jet that crashed into the sea off Indonesia last month was not in an airworthy condition on its second-to-last flight, when pilots experience­d similar problems to those on its doomed last journey, investigat­ors say.

In a preliminar­y report, Indonesia’s transport safety committee (KNKT) focused on the airline’s maintenanc­e practices and pilot training and a Boeing anti-stall system, but did not give a cause for the October 29 crash that killed all 189 people on board.

KNKT investigat­or Nurcahyo Utomo said the agency had not determined if the anti-stall system, which was not explained to pilots in manuals, was a contributi­ng factor. The report unveiled fresh details of efforts by pilots to steady the 737 MAX jet as they reported a “flight control problem”.

Contact with the jet was lost 13 minutes after it took off from Jakarta. Informatio­n retrieved from the flight data recorder showed the “stick shaker” was vibrating the controls, warning of a stall throughout most of the flight. The captain was using his controls to bring the plane’s nose up, but an automated anti-stall system was pushing it down.

“It’s very distractin­g and unnerving,” former Boeing flight control engineer Peter Lemme said of the stick shaker activation.

Pilots flying the same plane a day earlier had experience­d a similar problem until they shut off the system and used manual controls to fly, KNKT said. “This is considered as unairworth­y condition” and the flight should have been “discontinu­ed”. The pilots of that flight reported problems to the maintenanc­e team, which checked the aircraft and cleared it for take-off the next day.

Boeing, which has said procedures for preventing an anti-stall system activating by accident were in place, said pilots of the penultimat­e flight had used that drill but the report did not say if pilots on the doomed flight did so.

Boeing did not refer to a revised anti-stall system introduced on the 737 MAX which US pilots and Indonesian investigat­ors said was missing from the operating manual. Boeing said the procedure to deal with a runaway stabiliser, under which anti-stall systems push the nose down when the plane is not entering a stall, had not changed between earlier version of the 737 and the 737 MAX.

But pilots said the control column behaves differentl­y in some conditions, which could confuse pilots who have flown the earlier model.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa