Ecuador to allow assisted deaths
Quito – Ecuador decriminalised euthanasia on Wednesday, becoming the second Latin American country to allow the procedure, in response to a lawsuit brought by a terminally ill patient.
With seven of its nine judges voting in favour, the country’s Constitutional Court opened the door for doctors to help an untreatable patient die without going to jail.
The penalty for homicide “cannot be applied to a doctor who performs an active euthanasia procedure in order to preserve the rights to a dignified life”, the court ruling said.
The lawsuit was brought in August by Paola Roldan, suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a progressive neurological condition.
In her complaint, Roldan contested an article of the Ecuadorian penal code, which considers the procedure a homicide carrying a sentence of between 10 and 13 years in prison.
“I want to rest in peace. What I experience is painful, lonely and cruel,” Roldan, who is bedridden, told a court hearing in November via video link.
Ecuador follows in the footsteps of Colombia, which decriminalised euthanasia in 1997.
Lawmakers in Uruguay and Chile are currently debating the issue, while Mexico has a socalled “good death” law, which lets the patient or their family opt out of life support.
After studying Roldan’s arguments, the court in this traditionally conservative, majority-Catholic nation ruled that “it would be unreasonable to impose an obligation to stay alive on someone going through this situation”.
“Every human being can make free and informed decisions when their personal development is affected, which... includes the option of ending the intense suffering caused by a serious and irreversible bodily injury or a serious and incurable illness,” it said.
The court tasked the health ministry with drafting regulations for the procedure within two months. For its part, the ombud’s office would have to draft a bill on euthanasia within six months, to be approved by Congress within a year.
But Roldan’s lawyer Farith Simon on Wednesday insisted that “the sentence is immediately enforceable”. Roldan’s father said he had mixed feelings about the outcome of the case. There is the “satisfaction that Paola has been able to achieve a historic event”, he said.
But his family has a “half-broken heart because there could be an outcome... which is the death of my daughter,” he added.
When she learned that her case before the high court was in the final stage, Roldan said: “I thought I would not see the fruits of this lawsuit, like someone who plants a tree so that someone else can sit under its shadow.” –