The Citizen (KZN)

Aarto will ‘up revenue’

Issuing of licences can now be blocked pending settlement of debts. FINE PAYMENT OPTIONS THAT LOSE MONEY REPEALED

- Roy Cokayne

The Road Traffic Infringeme­nt Agency (RTIA) says the implementa­tion of the controvers­ial Administra­tive Adjudicati­on of Road Traffic Offences (Aarto) Act system will result in an increase rather than a decrease in income for municipali­ties from traffic infringeme­nts.

This follows a Swellendam municipali­ty report claiming that the implementa­tion of Aarto will have significan­t financial implicatio­ns and could result in municipal traffic services shutting down.

In terms of the Aarto Act, 50% of traffic fine revenue will be diverted from municipali­ties to RTIA when the act is implemente­d. The date on which the Aarto Amendment Act will be implemente­d has not yet been gazetted.

Minister of Transport Sindisiwe Chikunga said in July last year that Aarto would be implemente­d nationally from 1 July, 2024. But its implementa­tion has reportedly been delayed so the RTIA and the department of transport can finalise some issues.

The Swellendam local municipali­ty report further stated that for Aarto to function properly, the municipali­ty must enter into an agreement with the SA Post Office for the issuing of notices to alleged offenders, which is a huge stumbling block “as we now know post offices are closing down and they cannot guarantee sustainabl­e delivery of mail”.

However, RTIA stressed that the electronic service of infringeme­nt notices to motorists through e-mails and SMSes is allowed by amendments to the Aarto Amendment Act.

RTIA spokespers­on Monde Mkalipi said the value of issued infringeme­nt notices does not necessaril­y result in the same value being paid by offenders because of the options available to them upon receipt of fines. The offender can:

Pay the penalty, as reduced by the discount contemplat­ed in the Aarto Act, or make representa­tions to RTIA in the case of a minor infringeme­nt;

Pay the penalty, as reduced, for a major infringeme­nt; Make arrangemen­ts with RTIA to pay the penalty in instalment­s in the prescribed manner;

Elect in the prescribed manner to be tried in court on a charge of having committed the alleged offence; or

Provide informatio­n, in the prescribed manner, to the satisfacti­on of the issuing authority that they were not the driver of the vehicle at the time of the alleged infringeme­nt, coupled with the name, identifica­tion and residentia­l and postal address of the alleged driver.

Mkalipi said these elective options have impacted revenue collection for municipali­ties and RTIA, and occur when offenders lodge a successful representa­tion to RTIA to be tried in court.

He said the municipali­ties must then issue summons. But in the absence of such summons, these infringeme­nt notices will collapse in the system.

Mkalipi stressed that this shortcomin­g is not an Aarto problem but a Criminal Procedure Act issue.

He said offenders have realised that the municipali­ties do not usually have the capacity to issue these summons and thus choose to be tried in court, knowing that such fines will just collapse in the system because of non-issuance.

RTIA therefore repealed that elective option in the Aarto Amendment Act.

“All the revenue previously lost because of this elective option will now be available to municipali­ties and the agency,” he said.

Mkalipi added that RTIA and municipali­ties lost a lot of revenue during the Aarto pilot, with successful representa­tions resulting in notices not being served within the prescribed timelines provided in the Aarto supporting regulation­s.

He said RTIA has mitigated this challenge through the introducti­on of electronic service in the Aarto Amendment Act.

“This will result in a massive turnaround in revenue collection for both the municipali­ties and the agency. The agency has experience­d an average of 70% successful representa­tions because of the issue of service.”

Mkalipi said the Aarto Act brings a further additional advantage to municipali­ties because Aarto fines are not subject to the laws of prescripti­on.

In addition, Mkalipi said further “potency” is provided to the collection of Aarto fines by Section 20(5) of the Aarto Principal Act. This allows RTIA to block the issuance of driving licences, profession­al driving permits and licences until the errant offenders pay the fines.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa