Show a bit of gratitude – Busi
CHALLENGES HER RIGHT TO R10M ‘Public protector is acting unlawfully, unconstitutionally.’
Former public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane will be taking legal action against the Public Protector South Africa (PPSA) in a bid to receive her R10 million gratuity.
The PPSA said in a statement it had “duly responded” to her inquiry about her gratuity.
According to reports, the decision to withhold Mkhwebane’s gratuity was informed by a legal opinion that she was not entitled to it due to her impeachment.
Mkhwebane was removed from her position before her term ended in September last year.
A Section 194 committee adopted the final report that recommended Mkhwebane’s removal, after she was found guilty of misconduct and incompetence.
She was removed from office after 318 of the 400 MPs voted in favour of parliament’s Section 194 committee report, while 43 voted against it.
At the time, she said she was being targeted for “asking the 31 Phala Phala questions, the CR17 report, the so-called rogue unit report and for commenting on the economic impact of the Reserve Bank mandate on the poor”.
However, Mkhwebane said yesterday she was entitled to her gratuity and would approach the courts to force her former employer to pay what was due to her.
“Despite numerous attempts by my legal representatives to engage with the Office of the Public Protector regarding the gratuity stipulated in my employment conditions of service, our inquiries have been met with silence,” she said.
“A legal challenge will be imminently filed in the high court to address the interpretation of the employment conditions of service, relevant legislation and the constitution by the Public Protector.”
Mkhwebane argued the explanation she was not entitled to the gratuity due to her removal from office was “unlawful and unconstitutional”.
“I am entitled to equal treatment, dignity and fair labour practices and respect, as is every other individual,” she said.
“The heart of the matter revolves around the interpretation of the phrase ‘vacation of office’ in my employment condition of service, in conjunction with relevant legislation and the constitution.
“Regrettably, after seeking legal counsel, there is no alternative but to seek recourse through the judicial system.
“This decision has not been taken lightly, but in the pursuit of upholding the principles of fairness, justice and the protection of the rights of every individual under the law.”