The Herald (South Africa)

Market valuations of our properties a rip-off

-

NORAH Beukes, of Richmond Hill (“Shocked at rates increase”, August 2), is spot on.

The metro has been cunning in promising an increase in rates which it was expected to be a lower rate increase applied to a new higher valuation.

But no! Even though we have objected to the new valuation it has based the higher rates on the higher valuation.

This has also automatica­lly increased the SRA (Richmond Hill) levy – the SRA is actually undertakin­g work that the metro should be doing!

We purchased our property as a pension investment, but for the metro value to increase 81.82% plus an SRA increase is daylight robbery.

This amounts to R2 045.32 per month while we are bound by leases of 7% rent increase per annum.

In previous years when I had the privilege of serving as a councillor for Port Elizabeth Central, the valuations were referred to as “municipal” not “market” which are always different.

“Municipal” was based on the depreciate­d value of the property while “market” is what the current price is between a willing buyer and willing seller. This is a rip-off. Finally the point that is also annoying is that despite my objection, which was acknowledg­ed by the metro, it charges rates on its new valuation irrespecti­ve.

Goodbye investment income.

Colyn Myles, Port Elizabeth

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa