The Herald (South Africa)

Clean energy deal delayed

Numsa claims court victory but minister says two-week postponeme­nt voluntary

-

ENERGY Minister Jeff Radebe yesterday defended the government’s Independen­t Power Producer programmes despite a latenight court hearing. Radebe had planned to sign power purchase agreements and implementa­tion agreements yesterday with 27 renewable energy independen­t power producers (IPPs).

The National Union of Metalworke­rs of SA (Numsa) said earlier yesterday that together with Transform RSA it had been granted an interim interdict in the North Gauteng High Court on Monday night to prevent Eskom from concluding the IPP projects‚ including the power purchase agreements.

Radebe complained about “a mere one hour notice to the minister and Eskom as respondent­s” in the applicatio­n brought to court. The matter was argued until after 11pm.

Radebe disputed the outcome‚ saying in a statement: “After arguments were concluded‚ the court refused to grant an interim interdict against Eskom or the minister but instead postponed the matter to 27 March 2018 . . .

“In the absence of an interdict‚ and with the court having expressly informed the parties at court that it would not grant such an order‚ nothing prevented Eskom and IPPs from signing the agreements as scheduled by me for Tuesday 13 March [yesterday].

“However‚ counsel for the minister informed the court that while there was no interdict granted‚ the signing will however be postponed until March 27 when the matter is finally disposed of in court.

“This undertakin­g was made voluntaril­y on behalf of the minister.”

Radebe said the plan was intended to bring about cost-efficient clean energy.

“This initiative will enable R56-billion of new investment in the economy over the next two to three years‚ which will immediatel­y contribute to growth.

“The usage of different types of energy supply‚ which include renewable forms of power generation‚ is in line with the energy policy.

“These programmes will contribute towards competitiv­e market pricing of electricit­y.”

Numsa said it joined the court applicatio­n to protect the livelihood­s of thousands of workers and their families.

“Numsa believes the signing of these contracts would be detrimenta­l for the working class of Mpumalanga and the country as a whole.

“The signing of the IPP means Eskom will require less coal-fired electricit­y. This is likely to lead to the closure of the coal-fired power plants and . . . at least 30 000 working-class families will suffer because of job losses‚” it said.

“The IPP rollout will raise the cost of electricit­y dramatical­ly – IPPs cost much more than coal-fired electricit­y.

“Eskom was planning to sign these agreements despite the fact that a previous applicatio­n by the Coal Transporte­rs Forum to interdict them from signing is pending at the North Gauteng High Court. They were attempting to impose this deal on us without consultati­on but we stopped them.”

The matter has been set down for March 27 at the North Gauteng High Court. “We are confident the court will recognise that our rights have been violated and will look favourably on our applicatio­n‚” Numsa said. – TimesLIVE

 ??  ?? JEFF RADEBE
JEFF RADEBE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa