The Herald (South Africa)

Images of death still disturbing

- ISMAIL LAGARDIEN

Photograph­s are powerful mnemonic devices.

From family albums to the faded images of communitie­s and places that were willfully broken up or destroyed, photograph­s are alive with our histories and pasts.

There are times when the act of making photograph­s is as disturbing as what is captured within a frame.

Somewhere, on one of my storage drives, I have a photograph of the rubble and ruins of the Dresdner Frauenkirc­he that I took a few years before it was rebuilt.

The Frauenkirc­he was built in the 18th century and was destroyed in the firebombin­g of Dresden by the Allies during World War 2.

The picture of the destructio­n always reminded me of the carcass of an animal that was killed and then left to rot in a field.

Only, the ruins of the Frauenkirc­he were alive with memories and reminders of the horrors of war. For 50 years after the war, the ruins of the Frauenkirc­he were left in place as a war memorial.

Other than a distaste for war, and mixed feelings about the firebombin­g of Dresden and of the nuclear bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I have no personal connection, nor memories of the Frauenkirc­he.

After the reunificat­ion of Germany restoratio­n work on the Frauenkirc­he began in 1994, that fateful year that democratic SA was born.

There are very many pictures I have made over the years that are reminders of our cruel past.

A past which some of us would best forget, for they disturb our paddling in pools of privilege and confabulat­ion.

I, for one, continue to be disturbed by the banality of our cruelty.

At times I feel detached from past gestures of photograph­ing violence, death and dying.

In 2014, a little more than two decades after we establishe­d our democracy, I received an e-mail message about a different picture, one that I had taken in Lesotho 29 years earlier.

The person who sent the email wanted to confirm that it was I who had made the picture. This picture was of two people, a woman and a man, lying dead on the floor of their home.

Their faces were turned away from each other, as if one did not want to see the other dead.

They had been assassinat­ed by the SA Defence Force in one of many raids into neighbouri­ng countries to kill and destroy people and places.

The picture was never published – it was too horrific.

I remember the act of making the picture.

I stepped over the bodies, pointed the camera, captured the lifeless faces, stepped back and walked out of the building.

It was a seamless, almost mechanical, act.

Until I stepped outside and smelt the cool air of Maseru ...

Another angle of the couple’s bodies, photograph­ed by someone else, and captured while the photograph­er stood somewhere behind and to the right of them, was less gruesome. That picture made it into the Sunday papers of December 22 1985.

More than a decade later, the Truth and Reconcilia­tion Commission record of the event tells the gruesome story behind the picture.

“It was 1am, December 20 1985. A few days earlier their daughter, Phoenix, had her first birthday. Leon was in the bathroom when the house was attacked.

“Jacqui was murdered first. We could later see how Leon tried to break off the burglar bars. Bullets lay strewn in the bathroom and there were bullet holes in the walls.

“The bathroom floor was covered in blood, as were the hallway and kitchen. In the kitchen there was blood and human tissue because Jacqui was shot in the chest.”

The recollecti­on of this assassinat­ion was provoked by an obituary, this past weekend, of Major-General Jannie Geldenhuys, who was head of the SADF and effectivel­y oversaw the assassinat­ion of people during the 1980s using “unconventi­onal revolution­ary” methods.

As for the picture of the assassinat­ed couple – whose full names I will not divulge for the painful memories they might bring – there was a possibilit­y of it being published a few weeks ago.

Wisely, an editor recognised that it would bring back memories of a particular dark period of our past and withheld it.

There may be times when I feel detached from past acts of making pictures (of my own photograph­y), but I remain disturbed by the almost callous voyeurism of war photograph­y, and of photograph­ing death and dying.

When I do, I often recall Kurt Vonnegut’s reflection­s on the firebombin­g of Dresden.

“The Dresden atrocity, tremendous­ly expensive and meticulous­ly planned, was so meaningles­s, finally, that only one person on the entire planet got any benefit from it.

“I am that person. I wrote this book, which earned a lot of money for me and made my reputation, such as it is. One way or another, I got two or three dollars for every person killed. Some business I'm in.”

One way or another, I got two or three dollars for every person killed. Some business I'm in Kurt Vonnegut

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa