The Herald (South Africa)

Entry bar into SA public office too low

-

In reference to the state of the nation address theatrics by the EFF in parliament on the February 12 2015, Professor Itumeleng Mosala made the following observatio­ns, “So, last night the events at the state of the nation looked tragic and farcical.

But they were also comical. It is or should be clear that the country has never needed leadership than at this point!

Of course we mean leaders not celebritie­s!”

The chaotic scenes that many of us witness on live national television at what was supposed to be an “ordinary humane” sitting of the City of Ekurhuleni metropolit­an council law makers, was not only comical and tragic, but it was a display of one of the worst behaviours we have witnessed since EFF official entry into the parliament­ary and councils politics.

It also shows that the standard, quality, criteria, and requiremen­ts we have set ourselves for someone to qualify as public representa­tives in SA, is by any standard far too low.

I am not even sure if there is any standard or bar to refer to at local, provincial, and national level.

Many of the public representa­tives that I have seen so far display anger issues, lack emotional intelligen­ce, conflict management and negotiatio­n skills.

They are often too quick to resort to disruption­s of meetings/sessions and violence than resolution of disagreeme­nts and disputes as humanely as possible.

It is quite worrying that some of our public representa­tives who are meant to be our “law makers, defenders of the constituti­on and rule of law” at councils, provincial legislatur­es, and parliament, continue to behave in the manner they do.

And the worst thing is that these are the people who are supposed to be exemplary leaders.

In 2024, when we have so many problems, we certainly do not deserve these types of public representa­tives at any level, not even a kindergart­en deserve these types of leadership.

We appeal to all patriotic South Africans across all political divides to unite in condemning this kind of behaviour by public representa­tives. Many of us are tired of these spurious points of orders and disruption­s of meetings that we often see on live national television.

In my book, there is absolutely nothing robust, radical and revolution­ary about this kind of behaviour, neither does this type of behaviour demonstrat­e any leader of society qualities nor superior logic.

We have indeed set the entry bar into public office extremely too low, we have compromise­d the quality required at that level for someone to become a public representa­tive in SA.

And I know that many of these bad and angry public representa­tives, their supporters, and leaders; will continue to hide themselves behind Section 19(3) of the constituti­on of the republic.

There is nowhere in the constituti­on of the republic that says we must elect unruly and chaotic public representa­tives — they must go and reread the entire chapter of constituti­on on Bill of Rights to help them become better public representa­tives and leaders.

The chaotic scenes many of us witnessed live on national television at the Ekurhuleni council sitting, will not end any time soon as long as the quality of the vote is compromise­d, voters continue to support and endorse bad, disruptive, chaotic, angry and violent public representa­tives in SA.

Lesego Sechaba MogotsiAza­po

member in Tshwane

 ?? Picture:GCIS ?? OFFICE BEARERS: Resumption of the debate on President Cyril Ramaphosa’s SONA 2024 debate
Picture:GCIS OFFICE BEARERS: Resumption of the debate on President Cyril Ramaphosa’s SONA 2024 debate

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa