The Independent on Saturday

TARZAN TAKES ON THE JUNGLE

-

The Legend Of Tarzan Running time: 1hr 50min Starring: Alexander Skarsgård, Ella Purnell, Margot Robbie DIRECTED BY David Yates PRODUCED BY Jerry Weintraub

AFTER the creative and financial short-falling of numerous recent bigbudget franchise films it comes as something more than a mild surprise that The Legend of Tarzan isn’t half bad, actually, it’s pretty good.

Beautifull­y made and smartly set at the beginning of Belgian King Leopold II’s rapacious colonisati­on of the Congo in the 1880s, this is certainly the best liveaction Tarzan film in many a decade (which, admittedly, isn’t saying much), and offers a welljudged balance of vigorous action and engaging-enough drama. David Yates’s first directoria­l outing since capably overseeing the final four Harry Potter installmen­ts (his Potter follow-up, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, opens November 18) looks to swing to brawny box-office returns internatio­nally.

Edgar Rice Burroughs’s white boy raised by apes in the African jungle probably starred in as many or more movies than any other fictional character from the dawn of cinema to 1960, after which the vine-swinger was largely relegated to television. Since then, bigscreen film-makers have been more uncertain about how to deal with the muscular wild child uncorrupte­d by society, increasing­ly due to changing attitudes and sensitivit­ies about the depiction of colonialis­m, tribal Africans, a white naif saving the day, et al.

The most financiall­y successful modern take on the tale remains Disney’s animated 1999Tarzan, the most serious has been Hugh Hudson’s stately Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes in 1984, and the most ridiculous was unquestion­ably John Derek’s 1981 Tarzan, the Ape Man, in which the director was far more interested in photograph­ing his wife, Bo, in multiple stages of undress than in training his lenses on the title character.

Yates and screenwrit­ers Adam Cozad and Craig Brewer allow no such distractio­ns to get in their way here, as they deftly apply Tarzan’s jungle-learned know-how to the cause of fighting a real historical evil, that being Leopold’s enslavemen­t of locals and exploitati­on of his massive new central African colony. At the same time, there are certain moments when this feels like a 19th century ancestor of James Bond, beginning with the presence of Christoph Waltz as the main villain and abetted by multiple action sequences involving moving vehicles.

At its best, the film achieves what its makers clearly set out to do, to create a sweeping adventure that embraces the old in a new way. Many of the trademark tropes are present: giant apes making off with a white baby boy and teaching him the ropes, so to speak; the removal of the adult Tarzan (Alexander Skarsgard) to England to awkwardly assume his position as the wealthy Lord Greystoke; his marriage to beauteous Jane (Margot Robbie); the lure of precious diamonds that attracts unsavory characters to the jungle; and Tarzan’s eventual fierce defence of his boyhood home and those he, and his wife, grew up with.

Along with the deserved branding of Leopold as the ne plus ultra of colonialis­t evil, the new revisionis­t aspects also prominentl­y include the presence of a black American “diplomatic envoy,” George Washington Williams (Samuel L Jackson), in London to persuade Lord Greystoke to accompany him to Africa to find out what Leopold’s really up to down there.

The writers and director adroitly juggle the tricky job of propelling the main story forward while also sketching in sufficient back story for Tarzan and Jane. In this telling, the latter is a sharpminde­d, American-accented blonde who, like her husband, was raised in Africa. Far from being a tag-along wife, this Jane is a knowledgea­ble woman of the world with a deep feeling for the people and culture she grew up with and, thanks in part to Robbie’s spirited performanc­e, is probably the most plausible of all the main characters.

This is useful since she’s the one, rather than her husband, who ends up a hostage in the hands of Waltz’s nasty Leon Rom, whose original idea was to lure Tarzan back to Africa with the intention of trading him to a tribal chief (Djimon Hounsou) with a lifelong grudge against Tarzan. In exchange, Rom would receive a vast cache of diamonds to help finance Leopold’s African exploits.

So, with a few native companions and the slowermovi­ng Williams in tow, Tarzan sees his journey turned into a mission to rescue his wife, giving all the participan­ts’ abundant motivation for their strenuous exertions. During this long middle stretch, there are numerous lovely moments involving animals – lions, primates, water buffalo, elephants, crocs and more, all of which were computer generated, superbly and naturalist­ically so – Jane’s sweet reunion with the villagers who helped raise her and extensive scenes shot on fabulously diverse and hitherto unseen locations in Gabon, where the filmmakers spent six weeks. It’s a pictoriall­y gorgeous work, with particular kudos due to cinematogr­apher Henry Braham and veteran production designer Stuart Craig, who, ironically, performed the same job on Greystoke 30 years ago.

The film maintains a vigorous pace: pursuits on a slave train (a major project of Leopold’s) and river steamer, letting down somewhat only at the climax at a large interior military base and town; given all that’s come before, the final minutes feel comparativ­ely soft and rote.

The other fuzzy point, unfortunat­ely, is the portrayal of Tarzan, both in conception and execution. As Lord Greystoke in England, he’s stiff and rather out of his element. Once he gets back to Africa, he seems more at ease, but both the conception and portrayal of the character remain narrow and one-note. Physically, Skarsgard is a striking, and different, sort of ape-man. Tall and lithe, he carves out a very vertical figure, even down to his unusual abs, which are cut up-and-down rather than layered horizontal­ly. He’s also good in his African reunion moments.

Jackson, playing a former Indian fighter and Civil War veteran, gets to proclaim topically modernist lines such as “Mexico was bad but what we did to the Indians…” and “We ain’t better than these Belgians,” while Waltz plays his villain with pure cold blood, as a man who doesn’t even feel he needs to lay on the charm to disguise his evil designs.

The top-billed producer here, the late Jerry Weintraub, started developmen­t of this project in 2003 and went through any number of scripts, directors (from Guillermo del Toro to Stephen Sommers) and proposed stars (swimmer Michael Phelps, Tom Hardy, Henry Cavill, Charlie Hunnam). Those he and his successors finally settled on to bring Tarzan back to the big screen have done pretty well. – Hollywood Reporter

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? AUTHENTIC: Alexander Skarsgard is physically striking in his role of Tarzan in a new offering which achieves what its makers clearly set out to do, to create a sweeping adventure that embraces the old in a new way.
AUTHENTIC: Alexander Skarsgard is physically striking in his role of Tarzan in a new offering which achieves what its makers clearly set out to do, to create a sweeping adventure that embraces the old in a new way.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa