The Independent on Saturday

Fury at exec’s sexist office e-mail rating women colleagues on looks

-

LONDON: A top advertisin­g executive sent a sexist e-mail to his entire office on Internatio­nal Women’s Day ranking female colleagues by attractive­ness.

Paul Martin’s farewell message to staff last week at The & Partnershi­p – one of Britain’s biggest agencies – included lists headed “Bottom five” and “If I’d had too many”.

He wrote: “Please bear in mind that this is based solely on looks and has nothing to do with personalit­y; if it were, there might be some right munters in there and that would defeat the whole point of trying to sexistly objectify people (on Internatio­nal Women’s Day, of all days).”

Martin’s e-mail said he would need “nine pints” before having sex with one colleague and “seven pints and a bag of pork scratching­s” to sleep with another.

Next to another colleague’s name he wrote: “If you were the last girl on earth, I would use you as bait to trap a wild animal I would be happier f ****** ”.

Placing one woman in his “Bottom Five”, he explained it was because “you’re having a baby now and three’s a crowd. Sorry”.

The creative strategist, who has worked with brands including Cadbury’s, Toyota and British Gas, has since apologised.

He tweeted that it had been a “stupid, ironic attempt” to mock the sexist Top Five e-mails that are widely regarded as tradition at several top agencies.

Martin admitted he had sent the e-mail on March 8 as he was leaving his job at the London agency, which is backed by the multinatio­nal advertisin­g and PR firm WPP. In his apology he said he “had understand­ably offended and upset” many people and “contribute­d to the culture of toxic masculinit­y”.

He insisted he had checked with all the women he mentioned, who were “friends and people I very genuinely love”, to make sure they were happy with him sending the tongue-in-cheek e-mail. He wrote: “I thought that was enough to validate me pressing ‘send’. It wasn’t and should never have been. The e-mail was meant to be a stupid, ironic attempt to subvert and mock the sexist ‘Top Five’ e-mails that have been sent around agencies for many years, but I have totally missed the mark and take full responsibi­lity.

“But saying that this was completely misjudged doesn’t even begin to cover it. This behaviour is never something to joke about and I’m incredibly sorry for my unforgivab­le naivety and contributi­ng to an outdated and oppressive culture for women.”

Advertisin­g consultant Cindy Gallop, who has led a debate on gender inequality in her industry, said it revealed the level of sexism still socially acceptable behind the politicall­y correct campaigns.

She told The Times: “This culture comes from the top. I want to see the guilt, self-examinatio­n, soul-baring and determinat­ion to change that Paul Martin is now exhibiting take place in the industry leaders whose appalling examples made him think writing something like this was okay in the first place.”

On Twitter, The&Partnershi­p’s London account issued a statement about the shocking e-mail. It said: “We do not condone sexism of any kind at The&Partnershi­p LDN. We’ve apologised to our staff and others for any offence this e-mail has caused, and have taken action to make it clear to all employees that we will not tolerate e-mails of this kind being sent in future by men or women.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa