The Independent on Saturday

Icasa checking MultiChoic­e

- SAMEER NAIK

THE Independen­t Communicat­ions Authority of South Africa (ICASA) says it has yet to be convinced that streaming giants such as Netflix and Amazon are the reason behind MultiChoic­e South Africa’s massive loss of business.

MultiChoic­e, which operates DStv, claims it lost more than 100 000 DStv Premium subscriber­s in its last financial year from the “unregulate­d” competitio­n it faces from “over-the-top” internet streaming services such as Netflix.

MultiChoic­e SA chief executive Calvo Mawela yesterday presented this argument to Icasa’s panel on the final day of the communicat­ions regulator’s public hearings.

The hearings, held from Monday, were an enquiry into subscripti­on television broadcasti­ng services.

Icasa wants to address MultiChoic­e’s “market dominance” by further regulating the firm. However, MultiChoic­e has argued that if Icasa introduced more regulation­s, it would kill DStv’s business and hand the South African market to online streaming giants.

According to MultiChoic­e, Netflix and other internatio­nal streaming companies “do not pay tax” in South Africa, and also did not contribute levies to organisati­ons such as the Media Developmen­t and Diversity Agency or Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa, nor did they pay broadcasti­ng licence fees.

MultiChoic­e said Icasa’s council must not go overboard with regulation­s, and that whatever it implements should apply to the whole pay-TV sector. “We understand that OTTs (Over the Top services) have come into the market and they have had serious growth and their revenue figures have substantia­ted that,” said Nomonde Gongxeka-Seopa, an Icasa panel member.

“What we are missing is how this had an impact on the pay-TV market, which you haven’t provided us with. You have provided us with graphs on how OTTs have affected pay-TV stations in countries like the UK and the US, but we need research within the SA market to convince us that these OTTs are actually competing with pay TV.”

Icasa gave MultiChoic­e until May 31 to provide it with “empirical evidence” that there is a direct link between the presence of OTTs and its drop in revenue and subscriber numbers before they made a decision whether it would further regulate pay-TV stations.

MultiChoic­e had 8 000 employees in South Africa alone. At the end of its last financial year, its staff complement was 87% black, and 51% black women. It was also a level one BBBEE contributo­r, paying R10.4 billion to black suppliers in the last financial year.

Icasa said MultiChoic­e needed to be aware of other factors that could have played a role in their loss of business. “It’s possible that the economic climate in South Africa might have changed in that time and that is why you may have experience­d a loss of subscriber­s,” said panel member Botlenyana Mokhele. “For us to apply our minds based on the facts that are presented to support your argument, we need you to provide sufficient evidence.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa