No easy task testing 17 finalists for the COTY competition
BEING a juror on the South African Car of the Year (COTY) competition is really hard work, I promise. You don’t believe me, do you?
Admittedly even I questioned that notion after continuously jumping in and out of 17 different finalists to put them through their paces on the track and road over two days, and then filling in comprehensive score sheets for each one. Yes, you feel a bit worn out afterwards, but for someone who really digs cars of all kinds there surely can’t be a more rewarding way to spend 48 hours.
The SA COTY competition, sponsored by Old Mutual Insure, is one of the few national competitions that stages physical test days.
Of course it was a huge honour to serve on a jury with 25 fellow motoring journalists selected by the South African Guild of Mobility Journalists.
But as Uncle Ben would have said to Spider-Man, with great power comes the great responsibility of finding South Africa’s best car launched in the past year.
There has been considerable debate surrounding what constitutes the South African Car of the Year. Officially, as the Guild puts it, it’s a competition that rewards excellence.
But a string of Porsches winning a few years back stirred up a hornet’s nest of controversy, with many feeling the competition had lost touch with the average South African car buyer.
Very fair point. And in response, the competition now has numerous categories, meaning separate awards are now handed out to budget and compact cars as well as family-sized SUVs and bakkies, to name a few.
But the ultimate definition of the COTY winner, as the organisers made clear to the jury during a special training session ahead of this year’s evaluation days, is a car that represents excellence when measured against its closest market rivals.
It should be a car that pushes or resets the boundaries in its specific segment, whether it’s a budget hatch or executive SUV.
The gist of all that is jurors are instructed not to compare the finalists with each other directly, but rather with their direct rivals, which they’ve presumably driven at an earlier stage as full-time motoring journalists.
Automated scores, based on valuefor-money data compiled by Lightstone Auto, are also thrown into the mix to determine the ultimate winners.
With all that in mind we descended upon Zwarktops Raceway early on a sweltering Tuesday morning to put the finalists through their paces in a number of modules.
This year’s competition had 17 finalists within eight categories – there were meant to be 18 but Lexus could not supply LX test units for the evaluation days.
All the cars were parked into the pits at Zwartkops and we’d meticulously work our way through each of them before the day was out.
The first module took us onto the track to measure acceleration and cornering as well as emergency lane changing ability through two slalom sections and a braking test.
From there we’d move to the skidpan for another slalom in the wet followed by a braking test on the slippery surface.
If the finalist in question was a 4x4 with low range, then it would also have to tackle the off-roading course
at the facility. And so it was a day of in, out and repeat, while also filling in as much of the scoring as we could while the cars were fresh in our minds.
The following day, working from our base at the La’Wiida lodge in the scenic Hennops River Valley north of Joburg, we input our final scoring while also revisiting the cars we felt needed a revisit, on a section of road near the lodge.
We were given score books at the beginning of the event for easy jotting down on the run, but in the end we all found ourselves glued to our phone screens where each score was submitted digitally.
The score book has 32 questions where we rate each car on a scale from 1 to 10. These cover everything from interior practicality to connectivity, ergonomics, performance, ride, handling, braking, economy and perceived value.
I really love the “fit for purpose” question towards the end as it helps
me put an overall perspective on the vehicle. There’s often a lot of debate among the journos, some considering themselves “low scorers” and others being more generous with the nines and tens.
I lean a bit to the low side of the spectrum, but as a rule I only score below 5 if a car is really bad at something. For me a 5 is below average but more or less acceptable, a 6 is good but relatively average in the segment, 7 is impressive but not too far above average and anything above that is a certain degree of brilliant.
I handed out a lot of sixes and sevens, because most of the cars that made it into the finalist list were pretty darn good, I reckon.
But which car is going to win this year?
That’s something that none of us will know until the overall winner and category victors are announced in May. Roll the drums ... and wait a whole lot longer.