The Mercury

Harsh findings on cancer patients’ rights welcomed

- Nosipho Mngoma

THE damning findings of a SA Human Rights Commission report on the violation of cancer patients’ rights to access health care in KwaZulu-Natal, has been cautiously welcomed by organisati­ons which have been calling for concrete, life-saving action.

The commission and the complainan­t, the DA, will release the full report today.

DA KZN spokespers­on on health Dr Imran Keeka said although his party welcomed the commission’s recommenda­tions detailed in a press release last week, it remained to be seen how the government would react in implementi­ng them.

“We can’t have a protection­ist attitude from the premier, health minister and the ANC towards (Health MEC Dr Sibongisen­i) Dhlomo. That is what has been going on all along, with the issue playing out in the public domain with exposé after exposé being ignored,” he said.

It was the DA which filed the complaint in February last year with the commission regarding the negative impact of insufficie­nt radiothera­py treatment devices and facilities in the province.

The commission’s findings indicated that patients had in certain cases waited for more than 10 months for treatment.

The commission interviewe­d staff and patients, inspected Addington and Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central hospitals and sought responses from Dhlomo and the department.

Among its responses to the commission, the department blamed human resource constraint­s, saying it did not have enough oncologist­s.

However, Mary de Haas of the Medical Rights Advocacy Network rubbished this, saying oncologist­s only left the department because they could not do their jobs due to faulty equipment.

“That is a callous thing to say. Most of the oncologist­s worked at these public hospitals for years, we have just lost the almost last lot of oncologist­s, but this has been going on for years.”

De Haas said she would wait to see how damning the report was and if the commission had enough “bite” to resolve the oncology crisis “which has cost lives”.

“I suspect we will see a blame game, there will be sacrificia­l lambs, but constituti­onally the whole executive is responsibl­e for this. It has been a huge derelictio­n of duty on the part of the department which is led by a doctor.

“It makes it worse for me that Dr Dhlomo and the minister Dr (Aaron) Motsoaledi, being doctors, took the medical (Hippocrati­c) oath, yet the consequenc­es of their actions are that people are dying. It’s gross government culpabilit­y,” said De Haas.

The commission called on Premier Willies Mchunu to investigat­e whether Dhlomo had discharged his constituti­onal and statutory responsibi­lities for the provision of health care to cancer patients, and report back within 10 days of receiving the report.

Bishop Abel Gabuza of the Southern African Catholic Bishops’ Conference Justice and Peace Commission said the department owed it to patients to respond in a manner which shows it cares for cancer sufferers.

Lorraine Govender, the national advocacy co-ordinator for the Cancer Associatio­n of South Africa, said the associatio­n remained extremely concerned about future oncology treatment in the public sector in the province.

She said it was a shame that it had to take a Chapter Nine institutio­n to call for action for the lives of cancer patients to matter to the department.

“(We) remain hopeful that there will be measures put in place to ensure there are oncology specialist­s to assist with treatment,” she said.

While the department did not respond directly to the findings of the commission yesterday, it maintained that bringing in oncologist­s from the private sector was part of interim plans to continue providing health care to cancer patients.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa