The Star Early Edition

EFF drops Gigaba bombshell over Guptas’ citizenshi­p

- QUINTON MTYALA, DOMINIC ADRIAANSE AND NONI MOKATI

THE HAWKS say they have not received any instructio­ns to investigat­e allegation­s that Malusi Gigaba personally granted the Guptas permanent citizenshi­p in South Africa, despite their applicatio­ns being turned down.

This came as the EFF yesterday released a letter it claimed was proof that Gigaba had, while he was the home affairs minister, flouted the country’s immigratio­n laws to accommodat­e the Guptas’ applicatio­n for permanent residency after they had failed the requiremen­ts.

“At the moment, the issue rests with the SAPS. The SAPS has to contact the National Prosecutin­g Authority and look at the legal implicatio­ns of the issue. And based on the criminal priority of the matter, the acting national commission­er will decide on the final outcome,” said Hawks spokespers­on Brigadier Hangwani Mulaudzi last night.

The Hawks have so far confirmed that they had opened an inquiry into the authentici­ty of the leaked Gupta emails, which have detailed various incidents of the politicall­y connected family’s meddling in the government and parastatal­s and the awarding of tenders.

Yesterday, the EFF said it would challenge in court the granting of citizenshi­p to five members of the Gupta family in May 2015.

In a letter dated January 22, 2015 from the Department of Home Affairs, the applicatio­n for naturalisa­tion was rejected. According to the letter, the five had jointly applied to be naturalise­d as South African citizens on June 3, 2013, but according to “GG Hlatshwayo”, writing on behalf of Home Affairs Director-General Mkuseli Apleni, their applicatio­n was rejected.

The reason for the rejection was that they had not been physically resident in South Africa continuous­ly for five years and had spent more than 90 days out of the country.

In the letter, the Guptas were told that they would qualify to make another applicatio­n on December 23, 2015, provided they had not exceeded 90 days outside South Africa for every year in the five years preceding their applicatio­n.

But four months after the letter of rejection, Gigaba, who is now the finance minister, personally addressed a letter to “Mr AK Gupta”, stating that after “careful considerat­ion”, their applicatio­n had been approved. “I have decided, by virtue of the powers vested in me under section 5(9)a of the South African Citizenshi­p Amendment Act, 2010… to waive the residentia­l requiremen­ts in regard to your applicatio­n for naturalisa­tion and grant you early naturalisa­tion,” wrote Gigaba.

In April last year, the DA’s spokespers­on on home affairs, Haniff Hoosen, questioned Gigaba in Parliament over the granting of citizenshi­p to the Guptas and whether there had been exceptiona­l circumstan­ces.

In the correspond­ence received from the Department of Home Affairs in October 2016, it stipulates that under exceptiona­l circumstan­ces the minister may grant a certificat­e of naturalisa­tion to an applicant who does not comply with the requiremen­ts.

The motivation submitted by the Guptas for these exceptiona­l circumstan­ces cited their company Oakbay Investment­s and other interests, with supporting documents submitted, including Department of Trade and Industry company registrati­ons.

The correspond­ence includes that their applicatio­n reflects employment of about 7 000 employees, and that the Gupta family contribute­d to the South African economy.

These arguments were tabled as significan­t reasoning to provide substantiv­e grounds for considerat­ion of their applicatio­n for naturalisa­tion under exceptiona­l circumstan­ces as stipulated in section 5(9) of the Citizenshi­p Act.

“What is quite clear is that whenever there is favourable treatment towards this family, current legislatio­n has been used to hide any wrongdoing,” Hoosen said. He said any shred of proof of wrongdoing would warrant the citizenshi­p being revoked.

EFF spokespers­on Mbuyiseni Ndlozi said they would challenge Gigaba’s decision in court over his “irrational­ity”.

Neither Gigaba nor his spokespers­on Mayihlome Tshwete could be reached for comment.

 ??  ?? ‘FLOUTED THE LAW’: Malusi Gigaba
‘FLOUTED THE LAW’: Malusi Gigaba

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa