The Star Early Edition

Breaking down the distrust in black competence

- Xolani Qubeka Xolani Qubeka is the chief executive of the Small Business Developmen­t Institute, and he writes in his personal capacity. E-mail address: xolani. qubeka@sbdi.org.za

TO MANY economic transforma­tion is a money spinner! The advent of Black Economic Empowermen­t (BEE) has seen the emergence of new consulting companies that become overnight experts on what is loosely referred to as “empowermen­t” and most of these are wholly white-owned companies. This presents one of the major market contradict­ions.

Many large companies with substantia­l enterprise developmen­t budgets prefer to entrust that spend with white dominated institutio­ns ahead of black owned ones. Which means they cannot trust the many black owned companies and that the South African economy is still sitting on a cold afternoon apartheid stoep.

The economic power built out of historical wealth and carried by the captains of industry across various key industrial sectors has yet to be unleashed for the broader national interest. The custom of protection­ist tendencies is highly embedded in our economic ecosystem and practised through sectoral monopolist­ic and collusive systematic manoeuvres.

The business leadership across the spectrum seems to be only reacting to major internatio­nal market storms, rather than carving a long-term economic model that would bring a new economic epoch.

What is required is a new cadre of patriotic business elite that doesn’t only awaken after the Davos Christmas after party, but a leadership that knows and truly understand­s South Africa’s stark realties, whose elephant in the room is an old apartheid economic architectu­re that continues to stifle competitiv­e market dynamisms and in the process fails to engender higher economic activities that could be broadened by new entrants and new investment prospects. We need to lift the conversati­ons beyond rhetoric, and perhaps yes… an Economic Codesa!

Something has to break! Yes, first we need to break the strangleho­lds within the various industrial sectors that continues to perpetuate the “old boys clubs”.

Most sectors are still practising uncompetit­ive collusive behaviour with entrenched cronyisms and unfair market dominance.

This column will be focusing its subsequent editions on individual sectors each week, commencing with the automotive sector.

The aim is to look at the broader value chains of each of the key industrial sectors.

According to a report contained in the recent SA Automotive Export Manual 2017 compiled by Dr Norman Lamprecht on behalf of the Automotive Industry Export Council “the vehicle and component manufactur­ing production constitute­s the country’s largest manufactur­ing sector, and in 2016 accounted for 33 percent of South Africa’s manufactur­ing output. The broader automotive industry’s contributi­on to gross domestic product was 7.4 percent (4.7 percent manufactur­ing and 2.7 percent retail). Exports of automotive products in 2016 accounted for R171 billion, a further record, representi­ng 15.6 percent of total South African exports”.

One of the major requiremen­t by the government is to see the sector undertakin­g drastic economic transforma­tion, particular­ly in the original equipment manufactur­ing (OEM) segment.

There are more than 400 component suppliers in South Africa, with little participat­ion by black businesses.

Of course the South African government’s policy warehoused by the department of trade and industry (dti) plays a pivotal role in instigatin­g the developmen­t of the automotive industry, with its flagship programme, the Automotive Production Developmen­t Programme (APDP) having invested R 7.9bn in 2014 towards incentivis­ing the sector.

One has to wonder why General Motors, with all the good news and record breaking performanc­e of the sector, would instead elect to throw its toys in the air, pack its bag and go back home, is it failed competitor perhaps?, a topic for another day.

The one difficulty confrontin­g the eco- nomic transforma­tion process is that while the government generously supports the sector, it is overseas head offices of local internatio­nal companies that decides who should be suppliers of which specific parts of the respective vehicles manufactur­ed in this country.

Leverage

The dti should be using its leverage through the incentive schemes such as the APDP to force the sector to transform its component manufactur­ing sector, as part of the black industrial­ist programme.

Another component of the sector which is a cause for major concern is the panel beating and spray painting segment, otherwise referred to as the refinishin­g industry. This segment is highly lucrative but constitute­d like an unbreakabl­e cartel with limited penetratio­n for black new entrants.

According to industry expert George Booker, with almost 40 years in the sector, most of the problems the segment is facing are man-made and can be resolved. According to Booker there are now only two grades of panel beater shops available: non-structural repairer (NSR) and major structural repairer (MSR).

The NSR facilities are only allowed to do cosmetic work with no part replacemen­ts done.

Due to the grading system none of these NSR facilities are OEM approved and rely on out of warranty vehicles. More than 80 percent of insured and warranty work is being directed to MSR facilities but considerin­g that 70 percent of current accidents are drivable vehicles that do not require any structural repairs these MSR facilities are packed to capacity with work that should in fact be redirected to NSR shops that remain empty and out of work.

The point being made here is that the OEMs are complicit to discrimina­tory practices that favours establishe­d players.

Inhibiting factors

Quite clearly these inhibiting factors preclude the participat­ion of black panel beaters in the lucrative portion of the industry. According to Booker the approvals plan is controlled by two individual­s who have the OEMs in their pocket. Insurance houses are thus forced to only use these OEM accredited facilities.

Booker contends that apprentice­ship enrolment levels are at an all-time low in all areas of refinish operations.

At a time when there are millions of unemployed youth, we should be accelerati­ng the expenditur­e on training more apprentice­s.

I am also informed that entry into this MSR market in terms of facility is in excess of R15 million, which seem to preclude most aspirant and emerging black panel beaters.

Booker brings one scary dimension in this whole ecosystem. He points to an approval system being used to accredit and grade facilities, which should be conforming to OEM standards so as to be able to repair vehicles within warranty.

His assertion seem to suggest that the system is highly questionab­le and at best cosmetic.

In digging further I came across a reported industrial disaster in Bhopal which was described as the biggest industrial disaster that claimed the lives of nearly 40 employees because of “methyl isocyanate toxity”.

The safety of employees is important and it is critical for OEMs to be closer to these processes and ensure a safer working environmen­t.

I, therefore, wish to invite the leadership of the sector to engage in a much bigger conversati­on.

This platform therefore provides space and scope for that conversati­on to occur. It’s long overdue.

Another component of the sector which is a cause for major concern is the panel beating and spray painting segment, referred to as the refinishin­g industry.

 ?? PHOTO: SUPPLIED ?? General Motors’ car manufactur­ing plant in South Africa. Why did GM, with all the good news and record breaking performanc­e of the sector, elect to throw its toys in the air, pack its bag and go back home, asks the writer.
PHOTO: SUPPLIED General Motors’ car manufactur­ing plant in South Africa. Why did GM, with all the good news and record breaking performanc­e of the sector, elect to throw its toys in the air, pack its bag and go back home, asks the writer.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa