The Star Early Edition

‘Legal entities in probe of banks mixed up’

- Renne Bonorchis, Loni Prinsloo and Stephen Morris

SOUTH African antitrust investigat­ors mixed up the legal entities of some banks named in a currency manipulati­on probe and delayed hearings so they can reconsider the case, according to people familiar with the matter.

At a pre-hearing in Pretoria last week, the Competitio­n Commission’s lawyers indicated that some complaints may be applied to new legal entities, the people said, asking not to be identified because the meeting was private. More hearings scheduled to start next month have been delayed and the commission may have to devise a new strategy that could see it charge lenders individual­ly rather than as a group, one of the people said.

The commission in February alleged that 14 banking entities colluded to manipulate the value of the rand. In filings in May, HSBC Bank and Investec said the commission named the wrong legal entities. Standard Bank’s South African unit, Bank of America Merrill Lynch Internatio­nal and Standard New York Securities all said the traders the commission accused of manipulati­on on their behalf had either never worked for them or never traded the rand.

Standard Bank’s general counsel, Ian Sinton, said on Tuesday that the antitrust regulator’s lawyers indicated at the hearings that the commission would revoke its complaint against some lenders and may accuse others. Sinton said representa­tives of the accused banks and the commission had agreed to cancel formal hearings so that the regulator could have time to amend its complaint.

However, competitio­n commission­er Thembinkos­i Bonakele later said Standard Bank misunderst­ood what happened at the closed hearing.

It’s an error “There’s no truth at all that we may withdraw any allegation­s against any banks,” Bonakele said. “It’s an error. It doesn’t mean we’ll never press any new charges against any other banks.”

Some lenders said in the papers filed in May that South Africa’s antitrust authority has no jurisdicti­on, because there is no evidence the trades happened inside the country or had any effect on the economy.

The commission was asked by the Competitio­n Tribunal and lenders to make a clearer argument about its ability to target non-South African entities, the people said.

The commission argued that because trades were made in the rand, it would have impacted the country, according to one of the people.

JPMorgan Chase, Credit Suisse Group, HSBC Holdings, Nomura Internatio­nal and Commerzban­k declined to comment.

 ?? PHOTO: BLOOMBERG ?? Rand banknotes arranged for display in this file photo. The Competitio­n Commission alleges that 14 banking entities have colluded to manipulate the value of the rand.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG Rand banknotes arranged for display in this file photo. The Competitio­n Commission alleges that 14 banking entities have colluded to manipulate the value of the rand.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa