The Star Late Edition

Outcry over sale of Namibian elephant calves to zoo

- MELISSA REITZ

EXPERTS have condemned Namibia’s plans to export five infant elephants as a breach of internatio­nal agreements and causing unnecessar­y trauma to the animals.

Namibia’s environmen­tal authoritie­s have issued the necessary Convention for Internatio­nal Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) export permit for the sale of five calves by Eden Game Farm in Grootfonte­in to a zoo in Dubai.

Namibia’s elephants are listed on Cites Appendix ll with an annotation which limits the sale of live elephants to in situ conservati­on projects.

“By sanctionin­g this sale, they are underminin­g this agreement. The proposed transfer to a zoo in Dubai clearly fails to respect this restrictio­n, so it would appear that such a sale would be in breach of the annotation, and therefore might fall foul of internatio­nal rules,” says a letter addressed to Cites by Michele Pickover.

According to Namibia’s Environmen­tal Department, the sale is allowed under Cites regulation­s as long as it doesn’t threaten the long-term survival of the species and that the elephants would not be used primarily for commercial purposes.

But specialist­s disagree: “With their elephant population listed under Cites Appendix II, their attempt to possibly exploit the text stipulated by the annotation and restrictio­ns regarding live trade of elephants under this listing is unacceptab­le and must be challenged,” said Humane Society Internatio­nal’s Audrey Delsink.

“If approved, this sets a dangerous precedent, both in how elephants are managed and how internatio­nal treaties may be manipulate­d, and must be rectified.”

Pickover urged Cites to confirm the legal parameters of Namibia’s trade in elephants: “Can the secretaria­t confirm that the intention of the annotation attached to the Appendix II listing for Namibia’s elephants is to restrict all live elephant exports from Namibia to bona fide in situ conservati­on projects, and not to allow exports that are clearly commercial in nature, serve no conservati­on purpose, and come with serious potential implicatio­ns for the welfare of the animals concerned.”

The five calves, aged four to eight years old, will be taken from their mothers before being isolated and “tamed” for transfer.

The capturing of elephants has been globally condemned as there is no conservati­on value in displaying wild-caught animals in captivity, and also that the practice is cruel and unethical. These concerns are recognised in South Africa’s norms and standards for the management of elephants, which prohibit the capture of wild elephants for captivity.

“The sales of wild elephants can create a perverse financial incentive for other countries to engage in poor conservati­on practices, disguising the sales as conservati­on, wildlife management or as ‘rescues’,” says a report.

Research has shown that elephants are sentient beings which are highly dependent on family bonds and do not thrive in captivity. The removal of calves is extremely traumatic, causing severe depression and health implicatio­ns.

Pickover emphasised: “There is a critical mass of evidence to show that wildcaught elephants do not fare well in captivity. These young elephants will still be highly dependent on their mothers and family groups, and their removal will cause huge stress and anxiety for them.”

‘If approved, this sets a dangerous precedent’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa