The Star Early Edition

IAAF accused of suppressin­g survey by newspaper, broadcaste­r

-

LONDON: World athletics’ governing body (IAAF) have suppressed a 2011 survey that reveals that up to a third of the world’s top competitor­s admitted using banned performanc­eenhancing techniques, Britain’s Sunday Times newspaper and German broadcaste­rs ARD/ WDR reported.

The authors of the study, which involved interviews with 1 800 athletes at the 2011 World Championsh­ips in South Korea, were told to sign a confidenti­ality agreement a month after the informatio­n had been collected and analysed, the newspaper said.

The revelation­s are the latest in a series of damaging blows for the sport in the countdown to the start of this year’s World Championsh­ips in Beijing on Saturday.

Earlier investigat­ions by ARD and the Sunday Times prompted claims that more than 800 athletes tested between 2001 and 2012 had suspicious test results that were not followed up by the IAAF.

The IAAF have since initiated disciplina­ry action against 28 athletes after re-testing samples from the 2005 and 2007 World Championsh­ips with new technology that can uncover previously undetectab­le substances. The organisati­on came under heavy fire from the authors of the 2011 study, which was conducted by researcher­s at the University of Tuebingen in Germany.

“The IAAF’s delaying publicatio­n for so long without good reason is a serious encroachme­nt on the freedom of publicatio­n,” a statement from the researcher­s said.

The statement added that the IAAF had not commission­ed the survey but had used their influence to suppress the findings.

Reacting to the latest accusation­s in a statement, the IAAF said they “had never vetoed” publicatio­n of the survey and understood it had twice been rejected for publicatio­n in a scientific journal.

They also questioned the validity of the research. “The IAAF do however have serious reservatio­ns as to the interpreta­tion of the results made by the research group as confirmed by high-profile experts in social science who reviewed the publicatio­n on our request.

“The IAAF submitted those concerns to the research group but have never heard back from them.”

The study was financed by WADA, which told the newspaper on Friday that they had given the IAAF the power to veto publicatio­n in return for allowing access to the athletes at the 2011 World Championsh­ips. – Reuters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa