The Star Early Edition

The low hanging fruit in tax collection

- Bongumusa Makhathini Bongumusa Makhathini is the director of legal and external affairs at British American Tobacco Southern Africa.

AREAL question mark hangs over the 2017/18 tax season target of R1.265 trillion, notwithsta­nding the confidence expressed by the SA Revenue Service earlier this month in its ability to collect this sum.

Since the February Budget, the economic outlook has deteriorat­ed further as a feared ratings downgrade materialis­ed and the country entered a technical recession.

Although there are indication­s of an improved global outlook, South Africa’s ability to capitalise on this remains in question, given depressed business confidence and sustained political upheaval.

Record high unemployme­nt is likely to curb revenue from personal income tax – the biggest component of tax revenue – and, barring an unexpected resolution of material policy uncertaint­y and subsequent rebound in confidence, yields from corporate taxes may also disappoint.

As it is, customs duties fell short of the target last year by R6.5 billion, thanks to a contractio­n in real terms of imports, VAT similarly underperfo­rmed by R11.3bn and personal income tax by R15.2bn.

For the first time in many years, tax revenue collection­s lagged relative to gross domestic product (GDP) growth last year, indicating that the buoyancy in collection­s which has come to the Treasury’s rescue so often in the past can no longer be relied upon.

It hardly needs emphasisin­g that a shortfall in revenue collection­s cannot be plugged by increased borrowing, with total government debt sitting at around 50.7 percent of GDP and interest payments making up an ever greater share of expenditur­e, exacerbate­d now by a credit rating downgrade.

Further cuts in expenditur­e targets, with potentiall­y severe social consequenc­es, would seem to be the only option in the event that a shortfall in revenue collection­s indeed materialis­es.

Yet there are low-hanging fruits available to the SA Reserve Service (Sars), which would go a long way towards improving tax revenue performanc­e. One of these is improved tax compliance, specifical­ly relating to the trade in illicit cigarettes.

Every year, this illicit trade defrauds the government of an average R5bn in lost tax revenue, while conservati­ve estimates suggest that more than R26bn has been lost to the Treasury over the past five years due to illegal trade.

The illegal market is huge, accounting for around 24 percent of the total tobacco market in South Africa (or 5.4bn cigarettes) and putting us among the top five countries in the world in terms of the size of the illegal market, in the company of Malaysia, Iraq, Brazil and Pakistan.

Sars itself acknowledg­es the extent of the problem, stating last year that South Africa is losing an estimated 10 percent of its GDP, or R178bn a year, to the illicit economy.

It listed illicit tobacco products, counterfei­t textiles, drug manufactur­ing and smuggling, illicit mining of gold and diamonds, ivory smuggling and the poaching of endangered species like abalone and rhino as the major components of this undergroun­d economy.

Disturbing

Even more disturbing is that the bulk of the illicit cigarettes – independen­tly verified research puts the figure at more than 80 percent – are manufactur­ed in South Africa, by manufactur­ers who are based or have a presence here, and who are either failing to properly declare their production volumes and are thus dodging taxes due on these volumes, or who are producing cigarettes covertly.

The overwhelmi­ng majority of these illegal products are concentrat­ed in a handful of brands, manufactur­ed by a small number of local tobacco manufactur­ers.

In other words, it should be a relatively simple exercise to put a stop to this practice and collect the R5bn-odd in tax due on these cigarettes.

This is because South Africa employs an administra­tive method to collect tobacco excise tax, based on a “Duty at Source”. This means that excise is paid and regulated at the point of manufactur­e.

Whatever leaves your factory is taxed at a fixed rate per thousand cigarettes.

Manufactur­ers of illicit cigarettes get around this system by fraudulent­ly misreprese­nting the volumes they have produced, but it should be a relatively simple matter to stamp out this practice.

There are two possible solutions that exist to address the problem. The first is to legislate the minimum price based on the minimum collectabl­e tax (VAT and Excise), manufactur­er costs and trade margins.

One other potential solution to the widespread tax fraud in the tobacco industry is to introduce digital tax verificati­on.

This system – which has been successful­ly adopted by Mozambique, among many others – uses digital coding technology to print a unique code directly on to packs at the point of manufactur­e. This securely encrypted 12-digit alphanumer­ic code makes it easy to authentica­te every pack of cigarettes manufactur­ed in the country, anywhere along the supply chain.

It also automatica­lly feeds informatio­n on production volumes directly into a government-controlled, centralise­d database, making it easy for tax officials to determine the correct excise tax due on products manufactur­ed.

Customs officials should also be located at factories to audit product volumes, assisted by machine counters and better reconcilia­tion systems for imported leaf and finished products destined for exports.

This technology can also be used in other highly regulated industries, such as alcohol and pharmaceut­icals.

The investment required to implement it is negligible, relative to the huge sums in lost tax revenue that could be recouped and BAT South Africa stands ready to work with other legal tobacco manufactur­ers and the authoritie­s to do so.

Not only are the sources of illicit cigarettes easy to identify, but the products themselves are more often than not sold at a price well below the prescribed excise tax and VAT amount of R15.10 per pack, sometimes for as little as R7, which would be impossible if the correct taxes had been paid.

Law-enforcemen­t officials should be investigat­ing all instances of this kind of pricing, which patently stems from the illegal trade.

Job protection

We believe this would be in the interests not only of helping to meet the tax collection targets for 2017, but also in the interests of protecting the jobs, investment and taxes paid by legitimate tobacco manufactur­ers, of which we are the biggest in the country.

BAT South Africa contribute­d R10.2bn in excise – 27 percent of all excise in South Africa – and R14.5bn in total taxes (including sales, corporate and other taxes) to the fiscus in 2015.

We employ more than 2 400 people and indirectly support more than 72 000 jobs across the tobacco value chain, many of which are in small- and medium-sized businesses in the retail and agricultur­e sectors.

The level of our contributi­on to tax and to job creation is under threat from the illicit tobacco trade, which undermines our business and has already forced us to shed 690 jobs over the past three years.

The means to put an end to this are readily available, simple to implement and highly secure, and they could help solve a huge revenue headache for the government.

We should act now to plug the hole, before more drastic measures are required to balance the Budget.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Bongumusa Makhathini says that it is time plug the hole of illicit tobacco products.
Bongumusa Makhathini says that it is time plug the hole of illicit tobacco products.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa