Trappings of power, privilege

THE HIGHLY publicised case of ex-deputy minister of higher education and training Mduduzi Manana has brought out anomalies and contradictions in sentencing, reflecting the influence of power and privilege. Some would argue that the punishment of a R100 000 fine, coupled with the humiliation of 500 hours of community service, in addition to the personal reparations he will have to make, is adequate penalty.

Others see his violent attack on women as epitomising the alarming increase of gender-based violence. At the heart of public and political discontent is clearly a deep sense of outrage that Mr Manana continues to be a Member of Parliament, an esteemed institution. But he, like all parliamentarians, is appointed by President Jacob Zuma or the party bosses. If he had a real democratic constituency, he would be vulnerable. Clearly, the precarious Zuma administration prefers numbers to principle.

Furthermore, his public appearances clearly demonstrate his privileges, being ferried to and from court in luxury government vehicles and accompanied by bodyguards.

But perhaps most disturbing is the evident support Mr Manana has enjoyed from those wearing ANC regalia. Although his words communicate apology and repentance, his bearing and attitude do not. But is that a legal consideration?

Geoff Hughes is an emeritus professor formerly with Wits University.