The Star Early Edition

Questions asked as SA loses RWC bid to the French

Losing World Cup 2023 bid gives Saru and its stakeholde­rs a chance to focus on changing

- MIKE GREENAWAY

SA RUGBY president Mark Alexander has questioned whether the bid process to determine the host nation for Rugby World Cups is a “waste of time and money” after France yesterday sneaked in the back door to snatch hosting rights for the 2023 Rugby World Cup.

South Africa had been set for another dose of the good feeling of the 1995 event after winning the bid process conducted by the Rugby World Cup committee, only to lose out when World Rugby delegates yesterday voted in secret on the RWC’s findings.

It was a bitter blow for South Africa and SA Rugby boss Alexander did not try to hide his feelings.

“We produced a compelling bid document that earned the unanimous recommenda­tion of the Rugby World Cup Ltd board,” Alexander said from London. “That recommenda­tion was questioned last week by rivals, but endorsed a second time by World Rugby last week.

“However, the view of the experts and World Rugby’s leadership was overturned by World Rugby Council members, who may have had other factors to take into account,” Alexander said through gritted teeth before adding: “You wonder what 15 months of evaluation of the three bids at considerab­le expense was all about? You wonder if it is a waste of money.”

SA Rugby chief executive Jurie Roux said his organisati­on would not challenge the decision but at a later stage would question the identifica­tion process.

“World Rugby ran an exhaustive and transparen­t process for 15 months to identify the best host nation, only for the process to go entirely opaque for the past two weeks,” Roux said.

“We have always said that we would honour both the letter and the spirit of the process but in the (later) feedback sessions I am sure we will be recommendi­ng to the World Rugby Council that the verdict of the evaluation committee become binding.”

Closer to home, 1995 World Cup hero Chester Williams said he was saddened for the people of South Africa.

“We have to ask what happened when it came to the secret ballot?” Williams questioned.

Williams’ 1995 teammate Joel Stransky wondered how it is fair that France are again to host a World cup having staged the tournament just 10 years ago.

“Right now, 1995 seems an eternity away for South Africans,” he said. “But maybe this a reality check for South Africans.

Yes, it is painful to deal with the disappoint­ment of not winning the right to host the 2023 Rugby World Cup, but I also believe it should serve as a wake-up call to South Africa. Obviously, there was no better host between France, Ireland and South Africa than the country in the southernmo­st tip of Africa but rugby is a cruel sport. It is cruel because the voting countries failed to do the right thing and hand the hosting rights to the deserving country. The infrastruc­ture in South Africa is the best of the three nations courtesy of the 2010 Fifa World Cup and it would have been the most profitable one for World Rugby considerin­g the number of tickets that would have been available.

From a tourism perspectiv­e again South Africa would have been the perfect host nation with its varying attraction­s that have millions descending on the country every year.

But South Africa’s biggest flaw was their inability to garner enough support around the world and convince the rest of the rugby world that it was Africa’s time again.

The reality is that the loss of the World Cup bid surely should give SA Rugby an opportunit­y to look at itself in the mirror and begin the process of making the game accessible to the millions of South Africans that love it but are constantly shunned.

For far too long rugby has been a divisive sport in this country and even after the euphoria and short-lived nation building of the 1995 World Cup, rugby has dismally failed to capture and exploit the majority because of its refusal to change and do the right thing.

If there ever was a time to do the right thing it would be now so that all of its structures are fully representa­tive of the people of the country.

In all honesty, I don’t think much has changed in the sport after 1995 and even though there have been two black coaches in Peter de Villiers and Allister Coetzee, they, along with black players, are the exception instead of the norm.

Twenty-two years after that memorable World Cup, the first on African soil, we are still talking transforma­tion, even after the countless success stories of black rugby players who have played for the Springboks and at Super Rugby, Currie Cup and junior internatio­nal level.

We are still counting the number of black players that are in the Springbok team and always looking to justify their place and worthiness in the team.

We are still in shock at the lack of black players in Super Rugby and Currie Cup and the same excuse of “it needs to start at grassroots” is given for the thousands of black players that are not given an opportunit­y to progress beyond age group provincial rugby.

And even after the Springbok Sevens team have debunked the myth of there not being enough good black players, many within the rugby landscape still have the temerity to call black players “quota selections” and not looking at them for what they are, rugby players.

One still is shocked beyond words to see that there are still no black head coaches and assistant coaches amongst the Super Rugby franchises and Currie Cup premier division sides.

If there are any black coaches coming up the ranks, there is seemingly a concerted effort from the bosses at the unions not to support these coaches and to ensure that they remain as assistants or head coaches at age group level only.

The same applies to refereeing and the slow pace with which black referees are handed the same opportunit­ies as their white counterpar­ts.

One can still count on one hand the number of black referees that have blown a Currie Cup final been elevated to Super Rugby let alone tier one Test refereeing.

In the disappoint­ment and pain of losing the World Cup, let SA Rugby and the government make sure that something good comes out of this and that we make rugby a game for all our people.

 ?? CHRISTIAAN KOTZE / EPA-EFE ?? SADDENED: South African rugby fans react with disappoint­ment after it was announced during a public screening in Pretoria yesterday that France would host the 2023 Rugby World Cup.
CHRISTIAAN KOTZE / EPA-EFE SADDENED: South African rugby fans react with disappoint­ment after it was announced during a public screening in Pretoria yesterday that France would host the 2023 Rugby World Cup.
 ?? PICTURE: REUTERS ?? SMUG AS CAN BE: France’s Bernard Laporte, President of the FFR, addresses the media in London yesterday after the country won the rights to host the Rugby World Cup in 2023, despite South Africa being the recommende­d candidate.
PICTURE: REUTERS SMUG AS CAN BE: France’s Bernard Laporte, President of the FFR, addresses the media in London yesterday after the country won the rights to host the Rugby World Cup in 2023, despite South Africa being the recommende­d candidate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa