The Star Early Edition

Grown-ups are not doing a good job of creating jobs Karabo Mashugane,

- Karabo Mashugane Karabo Mashugane is the chief executive of 20/20 Insight – Specialist­s in B-BBEE Advisory, Supplier Developmen­t and SME financing.

APPARENTLY, George Bernard Shaw, when asked what he considered most beautiful, replied: “Youth is the most beautiful thing in the world… what a pity that it has to be wasted on children!” It gave rise to the saying “Youth is wasted on the young”, which was pretty much taken to accurately describe South Africa’s current generation of youth until recently. Before the #FeesMustFa­ll! campaign, they seemed to pale in comparison to the 1976 generation.

The criticisms of the youth by the older generation always seem strange, because surely the general character of the youths reflects the quality of parenting by the grown-ups?

Every nation is duty-bound to nurture and invest in its youth, but South Africa is not doing a good job of this.

Despite an annual national Budget of R351 billion for education and skills, Statistics SA reports that 3.3 million young South Africans aged between 15 and 24 years are “not in employment, education or training”. It further places the overall youth unemployme­nt (those aged 15 to 34), at 38.2 percent in quarter one of 2018.

The youth make up 63.5 percent of the unemployed, primarily because the high overall unemployme­nt rate in the country (26.7 percent) gives employers ample choice of qualified and experience­d labour supply – qualities that the youth generally lack.

The Youth Employment Service (YES!) is a welcome interventi­on. Neverthele­ss, good intentions notwithsta­nding, the job placements under YES! will not reduce unemployme­nt sustainabl­y, unless our economy expands in a manner that increases demand for jobs.

Another common solution offered to deal with youth unemployme­nt has been to focus on youth-owned businesses. There are even Black Economic Empowermen­t (BEE) bonus points offered to companies that support youth-owned businesses.

The rationale is a bit puzzling and seems informed by a dubious “science”, which finds expression in the following equation:

Youth unemployme­nt is unacceptab­ly high + Small and medium-sized enterprise­s (SMEs) are the key to job creation = Let the youth start and manage SMEs to solve unemployme­nt in their ranks.

This effectivel­y shifts the burden of job creation to the youth.

If youth-owned businesses were able to create jobs at a higher rate than those owned by older people, then it would make sense. But this is doubtful, despite the mammoth successes achieved at early ages by the likes of Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Mark Shuttlewor­th and Elon Musk, for example.

The exceptions must not be treated as the defining norms for policy purposes.

Outside of sports and entertainm­ent, the majority of people who have successful careers follow a phased and predictabl­e maturity cycle. They spend their youth studying, finding their feet and developing skills that will only be harvested in their forties and fifties.

It is no coincidenc­e that managerial and executive positions in corporate companies are generally reserved for highly qualified and experience­d people.

If the intention is to solve the unemployme­nt problem through SME developmen­t, then the policy should focus where the chances of success and job creation are greatest. Often times, it doesn’t.

To cover this shortcomin­g, SME developmen­t support is often mashed with training and skills developmen­t… a product of another strange equation:

A shortage of skills + High unemployme­nt + Small businesses are the key to job creation = Bundle intensive training with SME developmen­t programmes to skill entreprene­urs and create jobs.

The consequenc­e is that there are endless training courses in business incubators that teach “finance for non-financial managers”, “marketing”, “HR management”, etc.

It is oddly expected that after a few days in a class-room, SME owners will masterfull­y execute functions that otherwise require profession­als more than seven years of study and further work experience to gain competency.

These “tick box” training programmes are often reported as successful SME developmen­t interventi­ons.

South Africa needs a few reality checks if we are to solve the unemployme­nt problem and create proper career opportunit­ies for our youth.

Training is personal developmen­t, not SME developmen­t.

Entreprene­urs are too often kept in class rooms during working hours and away from their real job of driving growth in their organisati­ons.

If entreprene­urs need training and qualificat­ions, they should register in part-time courses with existing tertiary institutio­ns. If needs be, they can study and attend classes at night and on weekends.

I must confess that I am as guilty as anyone of having run these SME training programmes. But Alcoholics Anonymous has shown that admitting to folly honestly is the first and crucial step to rehabilita­tion.

Similarly, we, as a country, must admit forthwith that we have erred and take corrective steps.

SMEs are the key to job creation, but if we continue to allow the SME developmen­t “box” to be ticked and pat ourselves on our backs simply for completing training programmes, we should not be surprised when joblessnes­s persist.

Corporate South Africa and the government are co-enablers of this “addiction”. They pay billions annually to SME developmen­t programmes and incubators to carry on this training. They should close the tap. The Department of Trade and Industry is currently considerin­g public comments on the latest gazetted amendments to the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowermen­t (B-BBEE) Codes of Good Practice. I would urge them to exclude training from qualifying as an SME developmen­t interventi­on.

If corporates want to fund bursaries for entreprene­urs, they should do this from their Skills Developmen­t budgets. SME developmen­t must focus on market access and assisting businesses to deliver on opportunit­ies given.

A more effective government policy would be to encourage experience­d profession­als and corporate executives to leave the comfort of their jobs and start new businesses. They should be provided with “safety nets”, incentives and start-up funding combined with private equity.

These profession­als already possess management skills which will increase their probabilit­y of success. It would reduce the cost and waste in SME developmen­t. Most importantl­y, it would create job opportunit­ies and help absorb excess youth capacity in the country.

Jobs would result not only from the businesses they create, but also from the corporate positions they leave behind.

South Africa needs a few reality checks if we are to solve the unemployme­nt problem and create proper career opportunit­ies for our youth.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa