Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

The senior ranks of public service are filled with ANC cadres

Eye

- WILLIAM SAUNDERSON–MEYER Jaundiced

AFTER 20 years of thwarted hopes and expectatio­ns, South Africans are adroit at juggling the private truth and public lie. The ability to reconcile these two without guilt or a give-away smirk has become a necessary social skill to guard one’s career or business prospects.

This is a characteri­stic of nations drifting towards authoritar­ianism. “Going along to get along” is necessary where state power is unchecked, whereas there is less room for peremptory punishment by the state in a strong democracy.

The old Soviet bloc, bizarrely still so admired locally that we seek to emulate its discredite­d ideology, was infamous for this. Its citizens would enthuse in public over the state’s latest five-year plan while knowing full well that the resources to achieve it were figments of the imaginatio­n.

Among our own home- grown mythologie­s is the pretence that the public service is a profession­al, independen­t entity existing to serve the nation without fear, favour or political interferen­ce. In reality, we all know it is nothing of the sort.

The most senior ranks of the public service are composed mostly of deployed cadres of the ANC and SACP. Ability has little to do with who becomes the director of the National Prosecutin­g Authority, the head of a state-controlled entity, or the director-general of any of the many government ministries and agencies.

And the public service’s lower ranks are increasing­ly composed of the extended family of those appointed to the upper ranks.

Again, ability has little to do with it. Nepotism and jobs-for-sale reign unchecked.

It is, then, uncontrove­rsial to state that Riah Phiyega was appointed national police commission­er not because of a sterling career in the SAPS or, for that matter, any field remotely related to law enforcemen­t or justice. She took over from another political appointmen­t, chosen on the same criteria that got her the nod – because President Jacob Zuma wanted his cat’s paw in the post.

Given this seedy reality, why the more than three-year saga to now get rid of Phiyega?

One does not need a commission of inquiry and a disciplina­ry process to know that this grace-andfavour appointmen­t should be voided immediatel­y.

The reason it hasn’t happened is that labour laws and the rules governing public-service appointmen­ts correctly demand due process. In the circularit­y of South Africa’s idiosyncra­tic politics, that means that what are effectivel­y arbitrary appointmen­ts are, once made, protected by a carapace of regulation­s.

What a blessing for those who were once in ANC favour, but then fell from grace. Instead of being summarily dismissed, just as they were once summarily appointed, they can now invoke the constituti­on in their defence.

To be rid of them is then either to embark on a snail’s- pace legal process – which is what Zuma has followed with Phiyega – or to do a quick and dirty behind-the-scenes deal. That is why scores of failed public sector appointees exit with a happy smile, clutching a bag of swag the size of which appears to be in direct proportion to their incompeten­ce and/or dishonesty.

The irrational nature of all this is why I have a sneaking sympathy for the provincial police commission­ers who are having such a torrid time from the parliament­ary portfolio committee, which reduced KwaZulu-Natal’s top cop to tears. The nine – after a nudge and a prod from Phiyega – had issued a statement in support of her following the report of the Marikana Commission.

The ANC was enraged by their actions because the commission­ers appeared to be lining up on the side of Phiyega against a dismissal by Zuma. Parliament­ary purists were enraged because this was clearly an intrusion into politics by avowedly apolitical police officers. But these officers are not apolitical. They serve at the whim of a political appointmen­t, albeit she wears a uniform. Career oblivion awaits if they offend, and the only surprise is their naiveté in backing Phiyega against Zuma.

The politicisa­tion of the public service is a double-edged sword. It provides the ANC with a feeding trough for hungry lackeys, but also undercuts a linchpin of a modern democracy: a politicall­y inert administra­tive and security structure.

When a governing alliance starts fraying, as is happening in South Africa, the fissures created by the vying factions extend deep into the police and military. From small mutinies, big coups doth grow. Follow WSM on Twitter

@TheJaundic­edEye

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa