Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

Bill Cosby loses latest bid to have sex assault charges dismissed

-

NORRISTOWN: A Pennsylvan­ia judge has denied Bill Cosby’s latest bid to have the sexual assault charges against him thrown out, ruling that the 78-year-old comedian must stand trial.

Judge Steven O’Neill rejected Cosby’s arguments that prosecutor­s violated his rights by refusing to call the accuser, Andrea Constand, as a witness at a preliminar­y hearing in May, thus shielding her from cross-examinatio­n.

“This case shall proceed to trial on those counts,” O’Neill said at the conclusion of a three-hour hearing in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas on Thursday.

Once one of the most beloved US entertaine­rs thanks to his family-friendly persona, Cosby is facing accusation­s of sexual assault from dozens of women stretching back decades.

Constand’s allegation­s that Cosby assaulted her at his home in 2004 have resulted in the only criminal prosecutio­n against him, as most of the other claims involve incidents that are too old to produce charges.

Cosby, who wore a pinstriped tan jacket and used a cane to walk, has denied assaulting anyone and has portrayed the encounter with Constand as consensual.

“Today someone who has given so much to so many had his constituti­onal rights trampled once again,” said Brian McMonagle, a lawyer for Cosby, after O’Neill’s ruling.

Thursday’s proceeding stemmed from a preliminar­y hearing in May to determine whether enough evidence existed to have Cosby stand trial.

At that hearing, prosecutor­s chose not to call Constand as a witness. Instead, two police detectives who took her statement in 2005 testified as to what she told them at the time.

Christophe­r Tayback, one of Cosby’s lawyers, said prosecutor­s were using “hearsay evidence” improperly, robbing Cosby of his constituti­onal right to confront his accuser while relying on an 11-year-old statement plagued with inconsiste­ncies.

“It’s a statement that on its face begs more questions than it answers,” he said.

Cosby’s lawyers said the case should be dismissed or, in the alternativ­e, Constand should be ordered to testify at a new preliminar­y hearing and face cross-examinatio­n.

But prosecutor­s said current case law allows the use of hearsay at preliminar­y hearings, even though the issue is pending before the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court.

District Attorney Kevin Steele told O’Neill his office did not want to “re-traumatise victims” by requiring them to testify about their assaults a number of times.

“They’re saying they want to confront the witness?” Steele told reporters following the hearing. “Let’s go to trial and confront the witness. We want to get this case in front of a jury, and he can have a jury of his peers decide if he’s guilty.”

The hearing offered a preview of the defence trial strategy, which will probably focus on Constand and her credibilit­y.

Constand, a former basketball coach at Cosby’s alma mater Temple University, has accused him of drugging her and then assaulting her on a couch.

Cosby maintained they engaged in consensual acts. – Reuters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa