Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

Bank fraud victim fights for access to informatio­n

A consumer who lost R1.8 million through internet banking fraud coupled with an illegal SIM swop is taking her bank and mobile service provider to court to compel them to give her the informatio­n she needs to determine who is liable for her loss. reports

-

Monica Kruger doesn’t know who is to blame for the R1.8-million loss that she suffered when fraudsters carried out an illegal SIM swop before raiding her credit card and home loan accounts to the tune of R2 million. But of one thing she is certain: it’s not her. And she has forensic evidence to prove it.

Her bank, Absa, has not been able to find evidence of any negligence or wrongdoing on her part, yet it is refusing to refund the money stolen from Kruger’s accounts.

Kruger believes that Absa and Vodacom, her mobile service provider, have in their possession vital informatio­n that will assist her in establishi­ng who is to blame. Yet both have refused to give her the informatio­n that she believes she is entitled to.

On Monday, Kruger filed an urgent applicatio­n in the South Gauteng High Court seeking an order compelling Absa and Vodacom to provide her with the informatio­n she needs to conduct an independen­t cyberforen­sic investigat­ion into how the fraud occurred and to identify the party or parties against whom she could seek recourse. She is also asking the court to order Absa and Vodacom to properly preserve informatio­n over which they have control so that it may be used as evidence in the future.

According to Kruger’s founding affidavit, the fraud on her account took place on June 18. In the space of 32 minutes, in four transactio­ns, more than R2 million was transferre­d from her credit card and home-loan accounts into her cheque account and then 80 deposits of R25 000 each were made into a Capitec account.

It was only a day or two later that Kruger found out she had been robbed and the true extent of her loss. She didn’t receive SMS notificati­ons of the activity on her account or the adding of a beneficiar­y (the account into which the stolen funds were siphoned) because, unbeknown to her, she was also the victim of an illegal SIM swop (see “How a SIM ‘flagged’ by Vodacom was swopped”, right).

The day after the fraudulent transactio­ns, she realised that her phone was not connecting to the network, so she contacted a Vodacom franchise, which advised her to

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa