Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

Tragedy holds lesson for SA

Pittsburgh massacre a result of demonising ‘ the other’ by the radical left and far-right

- SARA GON • Sara Gon is a policy fellow at the Institute of Race Relations (IRR), a think tank that promotes political and economic freedom.

THE attack on a synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvan­ia, has been declared the deadliest against Jews in America’s history – but it came as no surprise to an organisati­on that has been monitoring anti-Semitism for decades.

The American Defence League (ADL), founded in 1913 to “stop the defamation of Jewish people, and to secure justice and fair treatment for all”, has monitored a dramatic increase in anti-Semitic incidents in the US since 2016.

The League’s function in recent years has grown to include fighting cyber hate, bullying, bias in schools and in the criminal justice system, terrorism, hate crimes, coercion of religious minorities, and contempt for anyone who is different.

The ADL started tracking anti-Semitic incidents nearly 40 years ago in 1979. Over this period, the highest single-year increase was recorded last year, rising by 57% on 2016 figures. Between 2008 and 2017, the lowest was in 2013 and the highest last year.

Anti-Semitic acts were most common in public schools, on university campuses, and in parks and streets.

Frightenin­gly, public schools witnessed an increase of 94% from 2016 to 2017. Incidents at college and university campuses rose to 89% over the 2016 figure. One must wonder at the role of parents, churches and lecturers.

Campus anti-Semitism comes from the radical left-wing and from NeoNazi groups.

After a wave of bomb threats to Jewish institutio­ns in 2017 (including the ADL), the League’s chief executive Jonathan Greenblatt said: “… But the real story is that one man with technology paralysed our communitie­s from coast to coast. In an era of rising rhetoric and emboldened extremists, we already are racing to mount new defences for our institutio­ns in the years ahead because next time we might not be so lucky.”

In noting the tragic prescience; commentato­rs have highlighte­d two issues in particular attributed to extreme right white anti-Semitism.

The first is social media: bigots can express their hatred publicly to large, supportive responses. Haters can access a range of websites which share their agenda. Every myth and anti-Semitic canard is reinforced.

The second is the incivility and aggression of public discourse on campuses, in the media and in politics.

John Locke said: “There is no greater rudeness than to interrupt another in the current of his discourse.”

Locke was one of the most influentia­l of Enlightenm­ent thinkers, also known as the “Father of Liberalism”.

Much criticism is being directed at President Donald Trump and the role of his divisive polemic in extreme right behaviour. The ADL says there was a dramatic spike in anti-Semitic incidents from about 80 in October 2016 to about 220 in November 2016, the month Trump was elected president. They then spiked to the highest levels in three years in January, February and March 2017.

However, much of the backlash by those who voted for Trump is attributed to the arrogance and derision of the liberal left coastal elites towards Middle America, particular­ly the white working and middle classes. The liberal left’s political correctnes­s has been seen as harmful to the situation of the above classes.

South African Jews also face the most vile anti- Semitism on social media daily. This is an example: “@ sajbd ( South African Jewish Board of Deputies) The #Holocaust Will be like A Picnic When we are done with all you Zionist Bastards. F*ck All Of You.” Another tweet described Jews as “vermin, who Hitler should have exterminat­ed completely”.

The author of this calumny is not on the far right, or any right.

The origin of anti-Semitism lies in early Christiani­ty. Any prejudice that emanates rightly or wrongly from religion is nigh impossible to eradicate. Since religion is imbued in a child from birth, prejudice becomes innate.

In the three centuries after Christ’s death, conservati­ve Jewish groups and the new Christian Jewish groups lived fairly harmonious­ly.

The first issue was Christiani­ty positing of the divinity of Jesus Christ. For Jews to believe in Jesus compromise­d Judaism’s essence – the direct relationsh­ip with God. The accusation of the Jews being responsibl­e for the death of Christ, however, sealed the Jews’ fate.

Deicide against all Jews was recorded in the 2nd century CE. In the 4th century, John Chrysostom, the arch-bishop of Constantin­ople, made the cornerston­e of his theology; expiation, pardon or indulgence were not possible. He denounced Judaism to prevent Christians from participat­ing in Jewish customs and leaving his flock.

Emperor Theodosius I establishe­d Christiani­ty as the Roman Empire’s official religion and, given the size of the empire, it spread very widely.

In the 5th century, Peter Chrysologu­s, Bishop of Ravenna, held that both the Jews present at Jesus’s death and the Jewish people collective­ly and for all time had committed deicide.

A recent South African example of this principle is “the original sin” that whites are tarred with – the perpetrati­on of dispossess­ion and abuse from 1652 – which cannot ever be escaped through individual action or over the effluxion of time.

Inevitably, superstiti­ons arose, including the horrific blood libel. Jews were accused of using the blood of Christian children to make unleavened bread in 12th century England. The irony is that Jews are prohibited by Jewish law from consuming blood.

The superstiti­ons flourished in the Middle Ages. Some – there were more – include:

• Desecratio­n of the Host – the claim that Jews stole wafers and tortured them by sticking pins in them, crucifying Jesus again.

• Jews as devils – Jews being depicted as pigs, as swarthy and hook-nosed, presumed to have tails and horns and to share the devil’s sulphurous smell.

• Polluted Jewish blood – that Jews suffered from blood diseases that could only be cured by infusions of Christian blood.

• Poisoning – In the 1300s, the Black Death claimed about half of Europe’s population. Jews were not affected to the same degree due to traditiona­l Jewish practices of hygiene and quick burial of their dead. So Jews were accused of causing the plague by poisoning wells.

• Jewish World Conspiracy – the claim, originatin­g in Spain in the Middle Ages, that a council of rabbis met secretly every year to cast lots regarding which city should supply the Christian victim for the annual Jewish sacrifice. This myth ultimately mutated to world financial domination.

The Pittsburgh murderer is likely to hold dear some of these odious suspicions, or variants of them.

Islam’s proponents regarded the third iteration of monotheism as the real true faith. Thus, Jews and Christians were regarded and treated as second-class citizens (dhimmi) – though, generally, Jews were never treated as badly by the Muslims as they were by the Christians.

However, degradatio­n became violent anti-Semitism in 1840 (before the rise of Zionism) when French Catholics introduced the blood libel to Syria. The blood libel and the superstiti­ons became and remain horribly entrenched in the Middle East.

Hamas condemned the massacre in Pittsburgh, claiming that as Palestinia­n victims of “Israeli terror”, the group relates to the shattered Pennsylvan­ia Jewish community’s pain. Even in offering sympathy to Jews, Hamas accompanie­d it with a gratuitous attack on Israel. Hamas’s constituti­on is intensely anti-Semitic.

Irrespecti­ve of one’s opinion of the Palestine conflict, vilificati­on through untruths and continual perpetuati­on of hatred through lies about “the other” ensures the conflict is irresolvab­le.

Let Pittsburgh be a lesson to South Africans. Demonisati­on can have devastatin­g consequenc­es. Our leaders owe it to us to stop demonising the other, irrespecti­ve of who it is.

 ?? | Cathal McNaughton Reuters
African News Agency (ANA) ?? A MAN prays at a makeshift memorial outside the Tree of Life synagogue following the shooting at the synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvan­ia, US.
| Cathal McNaughton Reuters African News Agency (ANA) A MAN prays at a makeshift memorial outside the Tree of Life synagogue following the shooting at the synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvan­ia, US.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa