Bibliografía

1. Kunzelmann, K.H., Komposite – komplexe Wunder moderner Dentaltechnologie. Teil 1: Füllkörpertechnologie. Ästhetische Zahnmedizin, 2007. 10(3): p. 14-24. 2. Kunzelmann, K.H., Komposite – komplexe Wunder moderner Dentaltechnologie. Teil 2: Matrixchemie. Ästhetische Zahnmedizin, 2008. 11(1): p. 22-35. 3. Ferracane, J.L., Resin composite - state of the

art. Dent Mater, 2011. 27(1): p. 29-38. 4. Manhart, J., Charakterisierung direkter zahnärztlicher Füllungsmaterialien für den Seitenzahnbereich. Alternativen zum Amalgam? Quintessenz, 2006. 57(5): p. 465- 481. 5. Vanini, L., Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 1996. 8(7): p. 673- 682. 6. Ardu, S., et al., Influence of water sorption on resin composite color and color variation amongst various composite brands with identical shade code: an in vitro evaluation. J Dent, 2011. 39 Suppl 1: p. e37- 44. 7. Manhart, J., Direkte Kompositrestauration: Frontzahnästhetik in Perfektion. ZWP Zahnarzt-Wirtschaft- Praxis, 2009. 15(10): p. 42-50. 8. Manhart, J. and R. Hickel, “Bulk Fill”- Komposite. Neuartige Einsatztechnik von Kompositen im Seitenzahnbereich. Swiss Dental Journal, 2014. 124(1): p. 19-28. 9. Manhart, J., Bulk-fill composites for posterior restorations. Inside Dentistry, 2015. 11(3): p. 58- 65. 10. Lenhard, M., Bulk-Fill- Komposite - der schnelle Weg zur Restauration? Quintessenz, 2015. 66(8): p. 879- 895. 11. Manhart, J., Muss es immer Kaviar sein? – Die Frage nach dem Aufwand für Komposite im Seitenzahnbereich. ZMK, 2011. 27(Sonderausgabe März 2011): p. 10-15. 12. Christensen, G. J., Advantages and Challenges of Bulk- Fill Resins. Clinicians Report, 2012. 5(1): p. 1-2. 13. Noack, M. J., Wirtschaftliche Füllungstechnik. Warum und womit? ZWR Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt, 2013. 122(3): p. 86-94. 14. Margeas, R.C., Bulk- Fill Materials: Simplify Restorations, Reduce Chairtime. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2015. 36(1): p. e1- e4. 15. Czasch, P. and N. Ilie, In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig, 2013. 17(1): p. 227-235. 16. Ilie, N. and B. Stawarczyk, Bulk-Fill- Komposite: neue Entwicklungen oder doch herkömmliche Komposite? ZMK, 2014. 30(3): p. 90-97. 17. Li, X., et al., Curing profile of bulk-fill resinbased composites. J Dent, 2015. 43(6): p. 664-72. 18. Zorzin, J., et al., Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater, 2015. 31(3): p. 293-301. 19. El- Damanhoury, H. and J. Platt, Polymerization Shrinkage Stress Kinetics and Related Properties of Bulk-fill Resin Composites. Oper Dent, 2014. 39(4): p. 374- 82. 20. Peutzfeldt, A., Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci, 1997. 105(2): p. 97-116. 21. Guggenberger, R. and W. Weinmann, Exploring beyond methacrylates. American Journal of Dentistry, 2000. 13(Special Issue): p. 82- 84. 22. Weinmann, W., C. Thalacker, and R. Guggenberger, Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater, 2005. 21(1): p. 68-74. 23. Lien, W. and K.S. Vandewalle, Physical properties of a new silorane-based restorative system. Dent Mater, 2010. 26(4): p. 337- 44. 24. Ilie, N. and R. Hickel, Silorane-based dental composite: behavior and abilities. Dent Mater J, 2006. 25(3): p. 445-54. 25. Ilie, N. and R. Hickel, Macro-, micro- and nano- mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites. Dent Mater, 2009. 25(6): p. 810-9. 26. Zimmerli, B., et al., Composite materials: composition, properties and clinical applications. A literature review. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 2010. 120(11): p. 972- 86. 27. Manhart, J., et al., Randqualität von Ormocer-und Kompositfüllungen in KlasseII- Kavitäten nach künstlicher Alterung. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift, 1999. 54: p. 89-95. 28. Wolter, H. and W. Storch, Neuartige Silanklasse - Werkstoffe für Formkörper. ISC-Tätigkeitsbericht 1992, 1992: p. 61-72. 29. Wolter, H., W. Storch, and H. Ott, Dental filling materials (posterior composites) based on inorganic/organic copolymers (ORMOCERs). MACRO AKRON, 1994(35th IUPAC, International Symposium on Macromolecules, Ohio, Proceedings): p. 503. 30. Wolter, H., W. Storch, and H. Ott, New inorganic/organic copolymers (ORMOCERs) for dental applications. Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, 1994. 346(Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.): p. 143149. 31. Wolter, H., Kompakte Ormocere und Ormocer-Komposite. Fraunhofer- Institut für Silikatforschung (ISC) - Tätigkeitsbericht 1995, 1995: p. 56- 63. 32. Wolter, H., et al., Neue biokompatible Dentalwerkstoffe auf Ormocer- Basis, in Tagungsband Werkstoffwoche 1998, Band 4, Symposium 4: Werkstoffe für die Medizintechnik, H. Planck and H. Stallforth, Editors. 1998, Wiley VCH: Weinheim. p. 245-248. 33. Manhart, J., et al., Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light- cured packable composite resins. Dental Materials, 2000. 16: p. 33- 40. 34. Hickel, R., et al., New direct restorative materials. FDI Commission Project. Int Dent J, 1998. 48(1): p. 3-16. 35. Greiwe, K. and G. Schottner, ORMOCERe: Eine neue Werkstoffklasse. FhG- Berichte, 1990. 2: p. 64- 67. 36. Moszner, N., et al., Sol- Gel Materials, 1. Synthesis and Hydrolytic Condensation of New Cross- Linking Alkoxysilane Methacrylates and Light- Curing Composites Based upon the Condensates. Macromol Mater Eng, 2002. 287(5): p. 339-347. 37. Moszner, N., et al., Sol-gel materials 2. Light- curing dental composites based on ormocers of cross- linking alkoxysilane methacrylates and further nanocomponents. Dent Mater, 2008. 24(6): p. 851- 6. 38. Wolter, H., Werkstoffe mit Biss. Teil I: Ormocere. DZW Die Zahnarzt Woche, 2015. Ausgabe 11/15: p. 10-11. 39. Ilie, N. and R. Hickel, Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J, 2011. 56 Suppl 1: p. 59- 66. 40. Frankenberger, R., et al., Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct class II resin composite restorations. Clinical Oral Investigations, 1999. 3: p. 208-215. 41. Braga, R.R., T. J. Hilton, and J.L. Ferracane, Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stressrelieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc, 2003. 134(6): p. 721- 8. 42. Kwon, Y., J. Ferracane, and I.B. Lee, Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater, 2012. 28(7): p. 801-9. 43. Braga, R.R. and J.L. Ferracane, Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004. 15(3): p. 176-184. 44. Chuang, S.F., et al., Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent, 2004. 29(3): p. 301-308. 45. Lokhande, N. A., et al., Effectiveness of flowable resin composite in reducing microleakage - an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health, 2014. 6(3): p. 111- 4. 46. Unlu, N., et al., Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2003. 11(4): p. 171-175. 47. Sadeghi, M., Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs. Indian J Dent Res, 2009. 20(2): p. 159- 63. 48. Sadeghi, M. and C.D. Lynch, The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento- enamel junction. Oper Dent, 2009. 34(3): p. 306-11. 49. Reddy, S.N., et al., The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2013. 14(1): p. 56- 60. 50. Haak, R., M. J. Wicht, and M. J. Noack, Marginal and internal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites. J Dent, 2003. 31(4): p. 231-239. 51. Tung, F.F., W.W. Hsieh, and D. Estafan, In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite resin. Gen Dent, 2000. 48(6): p. 711-5. 52. Tung, F.F., D. Estafan, and W. Scherer, Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: an in vitro investigation. Quintessence Int, 2000. 31(6): p. 430434. 53. Belli, S., et al., The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent, 2001. 26(1): p. 70-75. 54. Ernst, C.P., et al., Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner. Clin Oral Investig, 2003. 7(3): p. 129-34. 55. van Dijken, J.W. and U. Pallesen, Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. Dent Mater, 2011. 27(2): p. 150- 6. 56. Stefanski, S. and J.W. van Dijken, Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig, 2012. 16(1): p. 147-53. 57. Efes, B.G., et al., Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner. J Adhes Dent, 2006. 8(2): p. 119-26. 58. Boeckler, A., H.G. Schaller, and C.R. Gernhardt, A prospective, double- blind, randomized clinical trial of a one- step, self- etch adhesive with and without an intermediary layer of a flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation. Quintessence Int, 2012. 43(4): p. 279- 86. 59. Browning, W.D., et al., Performance of 2 packable composites at 12 months. Quintessence Int, 2006. 37(5): p. 361- 8. 60. Ernst, C.P., et al., Clinical performance of resin composite restorations after 2 years. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2002. 23(8): p. 711-7, 720. 61. Da Rosa Rodolpho, P. A., et al., 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater, 2011. 27(10): p. 955- 63. 62. van de Sande, F.H., et al., 18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base. Dent Mater, 2015. 31(6): p. 669-75. 63. Manhart, J., et al., Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent, 2004. 29(5): p. 481-508. 64. Heintze, S.D. and V. Rousson, Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent, 2012. 14(5): p. 407-31. 65. Opdam, N. J., et al., Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res, 2014. 93(10): p. 943-9. 66. Opdam, N. J., et al., 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res, 2010. 89(10): p. 1063-7. 67. Pallesen, U. and J.W. van Dijken, A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations. Dent Mater, 2015. 31(10): p. 1232- 44. 68. Pallesen, U. and J.W. van Dijken, A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations. J Dent, 2015. 43(12): p. 1547-58.