Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

IGP TOLD TO PAY RS.25,000 EACH TO TWO JVP ACTIVISTS

- BY S.S. SELVANAYAG­AM

The Supreme Court said yesterday the ignorance of the law was not an excuse and ordered the IGP to pay a compensati­on of Rs.25,000 to each of the two JVP activists arrested by the Police for pasting posters which read, “Stop Media Oppression and Restore Democracy”.

They were arrested in 2009 under the mistaken notion that the two activists had violated the law

Justice Priyasath Dep with Justices Sisira J. De Abrew and Anil Gooneratne delivered the judgment in a fundamenta­l rights petition filed by JVP activists Karunanaya­ke Joseph Benedict Silva and Chandrasen­a Hettiarach­chi. They were arrested by the Dematagoda police on January 12, 2009 while they were pasting posters in Dematagoda.

Dematagoda Police OIC Inspector P.G. Wimalasiri, police officer R.M.G.S. Ratnayake, the IGP and the Attorney General were cited as respondent­s by the petitioner­s who were represente­d by J.C. Weliamuna. Senior State Counsel Varunika Hettige appeared for the AG.

The Court observed that the respondent­s had failed to give a valid reason for the arrest and it could not be justified under the law

Police officer Ratnayake arrested the petitioner­s while they were pasting posters on the mistaken belief that they had violated the law.

The Court observed that the respondent­s had failed to give a valid reason for the arrest and it could not be justified under any provisions of the law.

The Court held that the OIC and police officer Ratnayake had violated the petitioner­s’ fundamenta­l right to freedom from arbitrary arrest.

The Court observed the respondent­s had acted on the instructio­ns of their superiors whose identities were not disclosed though they were responsibl­e for the violation. In such an instance no ruling could be made against the superior/superiors who had given orders to arrest the petitioner­s.

The Court said that because the OIC and police officer Ratnayake were by themselves not responsibl­e for the violation, it would not be fair to order them to pay the compensati­on personally to the petitioner­s.

As the State was liable, the Court ordered the IGP to pay the compensati­on on behalf of the State.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka