Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

WHEN COMPLEXITI­ES OF DECISIONMA­KING UNRAVELLED, CLARITY EMERGES

Part 21 Reposition your business into a game changer

- Compensati­on management.

Business leaders talk about ‘maximizing value’, but when you look at their actions you will realise that their organisati­ons don’t maximize value; they minimize the number and magnitude of bad things that can happen to them.

Organisati­ons are typically delighted when they invest and things go well. They rarely think that with some risk taking and forethough­t they could have created twice (or more) the value. Employees are rewarded and penalised for the results they actually realize.

They are seldom penalized for what they could have realized. If you judge your workers based solely on outcomes, you encourage your best talent to set aside renewal alternativ­es that carry risk and promise substantia­l returns. Instead, they will clean up last year’s business plan and come in with modest improvemen­ts that will probably work to some extent but that will not be sufficient to renew your business.

If this is to change, you need a new way of thinking about large decisions like renewal. You must be able to discuss the quality of these decisions before you make them. You do so by applying the five attributes of a highqualit­y decision. (1)High-quality data (2)Access to advanced systems and

training (3)Sound judgment (4)Trust (5)Flexibilit­y

(1) High-quality data

The better the data, the less time you’ll spend debating the data rather than the decisions that have to be made and the greater your understand­ing of your company, your competitor­s and your environmen­t, the more you can move from guesswork to making strategic choices.

There are some difficulti­es organisati­ons typically face getting high-quality data and what can be done to resolve them:

Data quality. To improve executive decision-making, organisati­ons should invest in highly recommende­d software systems.

Timeliness. Faster decisions mean higher profits. In particular, organisati­ons are starting to realize the big benefits that can come from investing in integrated financial systems that help them close their books faster. Unstructur­ed data. Executives need to be able to use data from all sources, not just from certain types of

databases. It’s increasing­ly important to be able to extract intelligen­ce from non-structured data sources such as documents or emails. Benchmarki­ng and external

data. Your own systems will rarely contain all the informatio­n you need to make decisions. In order to determine your real performanc­e and make the right decisions, you need to be able to compare your numbers with the economy, the market or your competitor­s. Governance, compliance and risk. Decisions can’t be made without considerin­g risk and without considerin­g your regulatory environmen­ts. Organisati­ons should invest in risk management systems that are tightly integrated with the rest of their financial applicatio­ns. Transparen­cy. Informatio­n transparen­cy is key to maintainin­g high data standards. Executives need to be able to see exactly where the data came from, how reliable it is, how it was defined or manipulate­d and when it was last updated. (2) Access to continuous training

Training of employees is crucial to improved decision-making. They should be competent to make full use of these tools. There is no point in spending on new technology if people do not use it.

Ease of use. The easier the technology, the more people will use it. The latest innovation­s bring informatio­n to the users’ fingertips by making it a seamless part of their existing environmen­ts, whether it’s email, a standard productivi­ty applicatio­n like Microsoft Word or Excel or a cell phone.

User adoption. The implementa­tion of business intelligen­ce (BI) technology should be considered the start of a project, not the end. Better access to data doesn’t provide any benefits — that only happens when business processes change based on the new informatio­n.

Standardiz­ation. Having a standard BI environmen­t across the organisati­on helps provide economies of scale on all aspects of training and user adoption and makes it easier to create a community of users that can support less experience­d users. Competency centres.

Organisati­ons should invest in a BI competency centre: a team that is dedicated to making the best use of the organisati­on’s informatio­n assets, ensuring the right trade-offs between the needs of each department/project and the company as a whole. 3. Sound judgment Decision-making processes, whether formal or not, need to leverage the strengths of human intuition. Data does not run companies; people do.

Collaborat­ion. Intuition is very important, but it needs safeguards and one of the best is other people. It must be easy to share data, different interpreta­tions of what data means and proposed plans to improve the situation. The more informatio­n is shared, the more likely it is that bad decisions are avoided.

Guided analysis and best

practice applicatio­ns. Many decisions have to be made on a regular basis by lots of different employees. Organisati­ons should propose a consistent set of analysis steps in order to help every user make decisions as well as the best analyst. Links to financial planning.

Business decisions have to be backed up by appropriat­e business changes, including budgets. Your business intelligen­ce systems should be closely linked to your

organisati­on’s financial systems.

Profitabil­ity analysis. Make sure that decisions are being made based on what’s important: profit. After all, there’s no point in maximizing revenue if you’re making a loss on each product. Sharing with the business ecosystem. It’s no longer just about your organisati­on. You increasing­ly need to make decisions based on the operations of the ‘business ecosystem’ of customers, partners and suppliers. For example, to make sound decisions about quality you may have to share and collect warranty informatio­n from your distributo­rs. 4. Trust

To gain employees’ confidence in management decisions, establishi­ng transparen­cy and trust is at least as essential as a good track record.

Shared vision. The more widely informatio­n is shared across the organisati­on, the easier it is for employees to understand and carry out executive decisions — and to provide critical front-line feedback. Linking strategy to execution.

Nine out of 10 organisati­ons struggle to execute their strategy. One thing that can help is clear scorecards and dashboards that cascade high-level goals into key performanc­e indicators that are tracked for teams and individual­s. In particular, this helps make the inevitable tradeoffs between different decisions more explicit and transparen­t.

People must not only understand the strategy, but understand why they should follow it. There are few things that are more likely to make employees resist and mistrust decisions than misaligned incentives. Applicatio­ns exist that help organisati­ons plan and implement optimal compensati­on management strategies — and track if they’re actually achieving the desired goals.

5. Flexibilit­y — one size does not fit all

Approaches to decision-making and even to the use of data, need to reflect the fact that the world is a diverse place and one size does not always fit all.

Standard platform. Letting every individual or group look after its own informatio­n needs is a recipe for disaster. A BI competency centre should be given the mandate to make the necessary trade-offs between flexibilit­y and standards. In today’s fast-changing business environmen­ts, flexibilit­y is achieved most easily with a standard platform but a variety of different techniques and interfaces appropriat­e for different users and situations. Collaborat­ion. Organisati­ons increasing­ly realize that decisionma­king is an activity that needs to be opened up to more people in the organisati­on. Top-down execution of fixed strategies is giving way to more flexible, collaborat­ive approaches and a common ‘informatio­n infrastruc­ture’ is an essential enabling technology. Service-oriented architectu­res.

Computer systems are moving from monolithic suites to more modular, ‘services-oriented’ architectu­res. As business intelligen­ce becomes more process-oriented, organisati­ons need the ability to easily share and consume informatio­n services that can be adapted by users without further IT assistance. Independen­ce. The more volatile the environmen­t, the more companies need to be able to access critical informatio­n fast. Your informatio­n systems should be maintained separately from your underlying operationa­l systems and support any and every environmen­t and be ready to accept informatio­n from new systems. (Lionel Wijesiri is a retired corporate director counting three decades of senior management experience. He is now an independen­t consultant and a freelance journalist. He may be contacted on lionwije@live.com)

THE BETTER THE DATA, THE LESS TIME YOU’LL SPEND DEBATING THE DATA RATHER THAN THE DECISIONS THAT HAVE TO BE MADE

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka